Patient Engagement
Top signal weightsIntegrations 0.16Package downloads 0.14Development activity 0.09Capabilities 0.08
Rank by intent
Ranking basisMost secureSecurity posture 0.19Integrations 0.14Package downloads 0.12Github activity 0.08
Same facts, re-weighted. Only the weighting changes, never the underlying evidence.
| # | Software | Score | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Luma HealthAI platform that automates patient engagement and healthcare operations | 70 | low · 47% |
| 2 | PhreesiaIntegrated patient intake and engagement platform that automates scheduling, registration, payment collection, and communication workflows | 64 | medium · 52% |
| 3 | UpdoxHealthcare practice communication and management platform with telehealth, secure messaging, and payment integration | 62 | medium · 52% |
| 4 | MendAutomated vulnerability detection and remediation for application code and open source dependencies | 59 | high · 75% |
| 5 | RelatientAI-powered patient access and scheduling automation for healthcare organizations | 50 | low · 35% |
| 6 | Artera | 40 | low · 16% |
| 7 | GetWell | 40 | low · 16% |
| 8 | SolutionreachCloud platform that automates patient communications and scheduling to reduce no-shows and boost practice revenue | 28 | medium · 51% |
Ranked by the Vioscale composite: independent signals, not user reviews. See the method.
Patient Engagement compared
Head-to-head on the attributes that matter here, with a source and date on every value.