Mend

Secure code, AI, and every interaction between them

Also known as
mend

What is Mend?

Unified platform for application security and AI security, providing SAST, SCA, DAST, dependency management, and AI security capabilities for code and AI systems.

Independently observed

Mend pricing

Plans, per-tier features and add-ons, dated and linked to live pricing. Pricing changes often; always verify at source before you rely on it.

Pricing as of verify at live pricing ↗Independently observed
from $250/moSubscription

$250–$1000/dev/year. Per contributing developer, annual billing.

Mend AppSec

$1000/developer/yr

Secure code, dependencies, containers, and AI components from first commit to runtime.

Mend AI

$300/developer/yr

Test AI behavior, harden prompts, and enforce guardrails continuously.

Mend Renovate Enterprise

$250/developer/yr

Automate dependency updates at enterprise scale.

What Mend does

The capabilities that matter for devsecops tools, normalised so it lines up with every alternative. “-” means we haven't confirmed it, not that it's missing.

Scan types
SAST (static analysis)
DAST (dynamic analysis)
SCA / dependency scanning
Secret scanning
-
Container / image scanning
IaC misconfiguration scanning
-
Governance
OSS licence compliance
SBOM generation (SPDX/CycloneDX)
Remediation
Automated fix / upgrade PRs
Prioritisation
Reachability / exploitability prioritisation
Deployment
Hosting
Cloud only
Integration
First-class CI / pipeline integration
In-editor / IDE scanning
Licensing
OSS engine available
-
Independently observed

Platform & deployment

Independently observed
Platforms
  • Web

Mend alternatives

Other devsecops tools we track, ranked by the same independent score.

Independent · unbought · dated

The Vioscale score: one lens on the evidence

Not user reviews and not a paid placement: a confidence-weighted blend of the independent signals below (adoption, activity, security posture, and more), which you can sort and re-weight yourself. Vendors can correct their listing but can never move their rank, and stars are weighted low as a vanity metric. It is one way to read the evidence for Mend, not the verdict.

Balanced composite 67 / 100
medium · 53%
Signal contributions to the composite score
SignalScoreWeightContributionEvidence
Security Posture7040.002800.0
Capabilities10012.001200.0
Reliability5018.00900.0
Pricing Transparency7510.00750.0
Price Level258.00200.0
Integrations012.000.0-

Computed . Re-weight it by intent, or see the full method.

All data & sourcesshow ↓

Every value we hold, with its source, retrieval date, and confidence. This is the evidence behind the score: don't trust it, verify it.

Features

AttributeValueEvidence
Capabilities{"sca":true,"dast":true,"sast":true,"sbom":true,"hosting":"cloud","ci_native":true,"ide_plugin":true,"auto_fix_pr":true,"reachability":true,"container_scanning":true,"license_compliance":true}mediumsource · 2026-08-03 · 60%

Pricing

AttributeValueEvidence
Free tierNomediumsource · 2026-08-03 · 60%
Modelcommercialmediumsource · 2026-08-03 · 70%
Price levelhighmediumsource · 2026-08-03 · 60%
Starting gbp250mediumsource · 2026-08-03 · 60%
TransparentYesmediumsource · 2026-08-03 · 60%

Reliability

AttributeValueEvidence
Status pageYesmediumsource · 2026-08-03 · 60%

Security

AttributeValueEvidence
GdprYeshighsource · 2026-08-03 · 75%
Iso27001Yeshighsource · 2026-08-03 · 75%
Soc2Yeshighsource · 2026-08-03 · 75%