Stark
A suite of automated tools for finding and fixing accessibility issues across design files, code repositories, and live websites
- Also known as
- stark
Available worldwide
What is Stark?
Integrated platform that helps teams detect and remediate accessibility problems throughout the design and development lifecycle, combining automated scanning with continuous monitoring and real-time compliance reporting.
Stark pricing
Plans, per-tier features and add-ons, dated and linked to live pricing. Pricing changes often; always verify at source before you rely on it.
From $198/user/year (Premium Pack, minimum 3 seats) or from $2,500/year (Launch plan). Free tier available.
Premium Pack
Automated detection and remediation for Figma design files with browser-based WCAG audits
- Automated detection and remediation tooling (Figma only)
- Automatic WCAG scans and reports in browser
- Live code highlighting in browser web dev console
Launch
Starter plan for small teams with basic scanning and monitoring capabilities
- viewers
- 25
- scan_frequency
- weekly
- pages_monitored
- 100
- report_retention
- 30 days
- 25 viewers included
- Monitor up to 100 pages
- Weekly automated scans and reports
- Supported assets: Figma, code repos, public URLs
- 30-day report data storage
- Automated detection and remediation tooling in design and code
Grow
Mid-market plan with extended monitoring, daily scans, compliance features and ticketing integration
- viewers
- 50
- scan_frequency
- daily
- pages_monitored
- 1000
- report_retention
- 180 days
- 50 viewers included
- Monitor up to 1000 pages
- Daily scans and insight reports
- Supported assets: Figma, code repos, CI/CD, iOS, Android, public and private URLs
- 180-day report data storage
- Ticketing system integration
- Automated draft VPAT report
- Compliance Center to manage accessibility posture
- Single Sign-On (SSO)
Scale
Contact salesEnterprise plan with real-time monitoring, unlimited viewers, advanced compliance and dedicated support
- viewers
- unlimited
- scan_frequency
- real-time
- pages_monitored
- 4000
- report_retention
- 365 days
- Unlimited viewers
- Monitor up to 4000 pages
- Real-time scans and insights reports
- 365-day report data storage
- Single Sign-On (SSO) and JIT provisioning
- Customizable terms and security reviews
- Priority support and dedicated account manager
- Enterprise-grade security, SOC2 and GDPR certified
What Stark does
The capabilities that matter for accessibility testing, normalised so it lines up with every alternative. “-” means we haven't confirmed it, not that it's missing.
- Scan method
- Automated rules engine
- Wcag level
- AA
- Ci cd integration
- ✓
- Browser extension
- ✓
- Design stage plugin
- ✓
- CMS plugins
- -
- Continuous monitoring
- ✓
- Vpat acr generation
- ✓
- Manual audit service
- -
- Overlay widget
- -
- Document PDF testing
- -
- Open source
- -
Platform & deployment
Independently observed- CLI
- iOS
- macOS
- Web
- Android
- Cloud / SaaS
Integrations (12)
Independently observed- Figma
- Sketch
- GitHub
- Chrome
- Arc
- Safari
- Microsoft Edge
- Brave
- Storybook
- React
- iOS
- Android
Stark alternatives
Other accessibility testing we track, ranked by the same independent score.
- axe-corelow · 32%
- UserWayA web accessibility compliance platform that automates detection and correction of accessibility violationsmedium · 56%
- IBM Equal Access Accessibility Checkerlow · 28%
- Pa11ylow · 30%
- Level AccessIdentify and remediate accessibility barriers using automated scanning paired with expert guidancelow · 21%
- accessiBeAI-powered web accessibility platform that combines automated scanning with expert testing to help organizations meet WCAG compliance standardslow · 42%
Compare Stark
Side by side against other accessibility testing, attribute by attribute, with a source on every value.
The Vioscale score: one lens on the evidence
Not user reviews and not a paid placement: a confidence-weighted blend of the independent signals below (adoption, activity, security posture, and more), which you can sort and re-weight yourself. Vendors can correct their listing but can never move their rank, and stars are weighted low as a vanity metric. It is one way to read the evidence for Stark, not the verdict.
| Signal | Score | Weight | Contribution | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing transparency | 100 | 0.08 | 8.4 | ✓ |
| Security posture | 50 | 0.07 | 3.7 | ✓ |
| Capabilities | 75 | 0.05 | 3.6 | ✓ |
| Price level | 25 | 0.05 | 1.3 | ✓ |
| Integrations | 32 | 0.04 | 1.3 | ✓ |
| Reliability | 0 | 0.07 | 0.0 | - |
Computed . Re-weight it by intent, or see the full method.
All data & sourcesshow ↓
Every value we hold, with its source, retrieval date, and confidence. This is the evidence behind the score: don't trust it, verify it.
Features
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Capabilities | Wcag level: AA · Scan method: automated-rules-engine · Browser extension: Yes · Ci cd integration: Yes · Design stage plugin: Yes · Vpat acr generation: Yes | mediumsource · 2026-08-25 · 60% |
Integrations
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Count | 12 | mediumsource · 2026-08-25 · 60% |
Market
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Availability | PrimaryMarkets: … · AvailabilityScope: global · AvailableCountries: … · NotAvailableCountries: … | highsource · 2026-08-25 · 75% |