Comparison

Stark vs UserWay

On the evidence we track, Stark leads this comparison with a composite score of 61/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.

Machine formatsJSONMarkdownGraphQLor send Accept: application/json
Stark61
UserWay54
Score
Vioscale score
Stark61 / 100medium · 55%
UserWay54 / 100medium · 56%
Pricing
Free tier
Stark
UserWay
Model
UserWayfreemium
Price level
Starkhigh
UserWayhigh
Starting price
Stark$2,500
UserWay$490
Transparent
Stark
UserWay
Integrations
Count
Stark12
UserWay1
Security
Disclosure policy
Stark
UserWay
Gdpr
Stark
UserWay
Iso27001
Stark
UserWay
Soc2
Stark
UserWay

Capabilities

Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for accessibility testing. “-” means undocumented, not absent.

Capabilities
Scan method
StarkAutomated rules engine
UserWayAutomated rules engine
Wcag level
StarkAA
UserWayAA
Ci cd integration
Stark
UserWay
Browser extension
Stark
UserWay
Design stage plugin
Stark
UserWay
CMS plugins
Stark-
UserWay
Continuous monitoring
Stark
UserWay
Vpat acr generation
Stark
UserWay
Manual audit service
Stark-
UserWay
Overlay widget
Stark-
UserWay
Document PDF testing
Stark-
UserWay
Open source
Stark-
UserWay

What each one is

The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.

Stark

Leader

Integrated platform that helps teams detect and remediate accessibility problems throughout the design and development lifecycle, combining automated scanning with continuous monitoring and real-time compliance reporting.

Independently observed

UserWay

UserWay provides automated scanning, AI-powered remediation, expert audits, and continuous monitoring to help organizations comply with WCAG, ADA, and Section 508 accessibility standards while managing legal risk.

Independently observed

Pricing

List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.

Stark

Leader
from $2500/yrSubscriptionFree tier

From $198/user/year (Premium Pack, minimum 3 seats) or from $2,500/year (Launch plan). Free tier available.

  • Premium Pack$198/user/year (minimum 3 seats)
    • Automated detection and remediation tooling (Figma only)
    • Automatic WCAG scans and reports in browser
    • Live code highlighting in browser web dev console
  • Launch$2,500/year
    • 25 viewers included
    • Monitor up to 100 pages
    • Weekly automated scans and reports
    • Supported assets: Figma, code repos, public URLs
    • 30-day report data storage
    • +1 more
  • Grow$8,000/year
    • 50 viewers included
    • Monitor up to 1000 pages
    • Daily scans and insight reports
    • Supported assets: Figma, code repos, CI/CD, iOS, Android, public and private URLs
    • 180-day report data storage
    • +4 more
  • ScaleContact sales
    • Unlimited viewers
    • Monitor up to 4000 pages
    • Real-time scans and insights reports
    • 365-day report data storage
    • Single Sign-On (SSO) and JIT provisioning
    • +3 more
as of verify ↗

UserWay

from $490/moSubscriptionFree tier

From $490/mo based on site traffic. Free trial available. Annual subscriptions include litigation support from legal experts.

  • Standard$490/mo based on traffic level
    • Automated remediation based on WCAG, Section 508, & EN 301 549
    • Monitoring
    • Widget add-ons
  • Pro$1,190/mo based on traffic level
    • AI-powered remediation
    • Enhanced monitoring
    • Widget add-ons
as of verify ↗

Platform & deployment

Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.

Platforms
Web
Stark
UserWay
iOS
Stark
UserWay
Android
Stark
UserWay
macOS
Stark
UserWay
CLI
Stark
UserWay
Deployment
Cloud / SaaS
Stark
UserWay

Integrations

What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.

Stark

Leader
12 total
  • Figma
  • Sketch
  • GitHub
  • Chrome
  • Arc
  • Safari
  • Microsoft Edge
  • Brave
  • Storybook
  • React
  • iOS
  • Android
Independently observed

UserWay

1 total
  • Jira
Independently observed

Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.