Comparison

Evinced vs Stark

On the evidence we track, Stark leads this comparison with a composite score of 61/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.

Machine formatsJSONMarkdownGraphQLor send Accept: application/json
Evinced27
Stark61
Score
Vioscale score
Evinced27 / 100low · 3%
Stark61 / 100medium · 55%
Pricing
Free tier
Evinced
Stark
Model
Evincedcommercial
Price level
Evinced
Starkhigh
Starting price
Evinced
Stark$2,500
Transparent
Evinced
Stark
Integrations
Count
Evinced8
Stark12
Security
Disclosure policy
Evinced
Stark
Gdpr
Evinced
Stark
Soc2
Evinced
Stark

Capabilities

Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for accessibility testing. “-” means undocumented, not absent.

Capabilities
Scan method
Evinced-
StarkAutomated rules engine
Wcag level
Evinced-
StarkAA
Ci cd integration
Evinced-
Stark
Browser extension
Evinced-
Stark
Design stage plugin
Evinced-
Stark
CMS plugins
Evinced-
Stark-
Continuous monitoring
Evinced-
Stark
Vpat acr generation
Evinced-
Stark
Manual audit service
Evinced-
Stark-
Overlay widget
Evinced-
Stark-
Document PDF testing
Evinced-
Stark-
Open source
Evinced-
Stark-

What each one is

The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.

Evinced

Uses machine learning to find and categorize accessibility issues in web and mobile applications as they're being developed, integrating with standard testing frameworks and deployment pipelines to make accessibility testing a routine part of development.

Independently observed

Stark

Leader

Integrated platform that helps teams detect and remediate accessibility problems throughout the design and development lifecycle, combining automated scanning with continuous monitoring and real-time compliance reporting.

Independently observed

Pricing

List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.

Evinced

Pricing not documented yet.

Stark

Leader
from $2500/yrSubscriptionFree tier

From $198/user/year (Premium Pack, minimum 3 seats) or from $2,500/year (Launch plan). Free tier available.

  • Premium Pack$198/user/year (minimum 3 seats)
    • Automated detection and remediation tooling (Figma only)
    • Automatic WCAG scans and reports in browser
    • Live code highlighting in browser web dev console
  • Launch$2,500/year
    • 25 viewers included
    • Monitor up to 100 pages
    • Weekly automated scans and reports
    • Supported assets: Figma, code repos, public URLs
    • 30-day report data storage
    • +1 more
  • Grow$8,000/year
    • 50 viewers included
    • Monitor up to 1000 pages
    • Daily scans and insight reports
    • Supported assets: Figma, code repos, CI/CD, iOS, Android, public and private URLs
    • 180-day report data storage
    • +4 more
  • ScaleContact sales
    • Unlimited viewers
    • Monitor up to 4000 pages
    • Real-time scans and insights reports
    • 365-day report data storage
    • Single Sign-On (SSO) and JIT provisioning
    • +3 more
as of verify ↗

Platform & deployment

Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.

Platforms
Web
Evinced
Stark
iOS
Evinced
Stark
Android
Evinced
Stark
macOS
Evinced
Stark
CLI
Evinced
Stark
Deployment
Cloud / SaaS
Evinced
Stark

Integrations

What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.

Evinced

8 total
  • Selenium
  • Cypress
  • WebdriverIO
  • XCUITest
  • Espresso
  • Appium
  • Jenkins
  • CircleCI
Independently observed

Stark

Leader
12 total
  • Figma
  • Sketch
  • GitHub
  • Chrome
  • Arc
  • Safari
  • Microsoft Edge
  • Brave
  • Storybook
  • React
  • iOS
  • Android
Independently observed

Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.