StackHawk
Integrates security vulnerability scanning into AI coding agents and development workflows
- Also known as
- stackhawk
Available worldwide
What is StackHawk?
A platform that enables AI coding agents (such as Claude, GitHub Copilot, Cursor) to automatically identify, analyze, and remediate security vulnerabilities in applications during development, eliminating context switching and manual handoffs to security teams.
StackHawk pricing
Plans, per-tier features and add-ons, dated and linked to live pricing. Pricing changes often; always verify at source before you rely on it.
From $10/user/month (Wingman). 14-day free trial. Scale plan available via sales consultation.
Wingman
For individuals and teams shipping with AI coding agents
- apps
- unlimited
- scans
- 50/user/month
- Works inside Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot
- Auto-configures and boots app
- Runtime testing against running app
- Finds and fixes vulnerabilities in same session
- Auto-rescanning to verify fix
- Pre-PR security attestation
- Unlimited apps
- 50 scans/user/month
Scale
Contact salesFor security teams needing attack surface discovery, coverage, and proof across every app
- apps
- unlimited
- scans
- unlimited
- Everything in Wingman
- Attack surface discovery
- Sensitive data detection
- Deeper, broader scan coverage
- Program reporting (coverage, fix rates by team)
- Teams, roles, and enterprise support
- Unlimited agentic scans
What StackHawk does
The capabilities that matter for devsecops tools, normalised so it lines up with every alternative. “-” means we haven't confirmed it, not that it's missing.
- SAST (static analysis)
- -
- DAST (dynamic analysis)
- ✓
- SCA / dependency scanning
- -
- Secret scanning
- -
- Container / image scanning
- -
- IaC misconfiguration scanning
- -
- OSS licence compliance
- -
- SBOM generation (SPDX/CycloneDX)
- -
- Automated fix / upgrade PRs
- ✓
- Reachability / exploitability prioritisation
- -
- Hosting
- Cloud only
- First-class CI / pipeline integration
- ✓
- In-editor / IDE scanning
- ✓
- OSS engine available
- ✓
Platform & deployment
Independently observed- CLI
- Web
- Cloud / SaaS
Integrations (12)
Independently observed- Claude Code
- Codex
- Gemini CLI
- GitHub Copilot
- OpenCode
- Cursor
- Snyk
- Auth0
- GitHub Actions
- GitLab
- Jenkins
- CircleCI
StackHawk FAQ
Common questions about StackHawk, answered from independent, dated evidence.
What is StackHawk?
A platform that enables AI coding agents (such as Claude, GitHub Copilot, Cursor) to automatically identify, analyze, and remediate security vulnerabilities in applications during development, eliminating context switching and manual handoffs to security teams. It is indexed under DevSecOps Tools.
Is StackHawk free?
StackHawk offers a free tier, so you can start without paying. Paid plans start at $10 per user per month. Pricing changes often, so verify at source before relying on it.
Source: https://www.stackhawk.com
What platforms does StackHawk support?
StackHawk supports the web and a command-line interface. Platforms we have not confirmed are simply not listed here rather than ruled out.
Can StackHawk be self-hosted?
We have only confirmed a cloud / SaaS deployment for StackHawk, so it appears to be vendor-hosted. If a self-hosted option exists we have not found it documented publicly.
What does StackHawk integrate with?
We have confirmed 12 integrations for StackHawk, including Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, OpenCode, Cursor, Snyk and Auth0, plus 4 more. This is what we could verify from public sources, so the vendor may support others we have not indexed.
What security certifications does StackHawk have?
We have independently confirmed SOC 2 for StackHawk. Certifications we do not list are ones we have not been able to verify from public sources, which is not the same as StackHawk not holding them. Always confirm compliance directly before you rely on it.
StackHawk alternatives
Other devsecops tools we track, ranked by the same independent score.
- SnykContinuous validation layer for AI-generated code and development agentshigh · 75%
- SonarQubeAutomated static analysis platform that identifies and helps fix code quality issues, security vulnerabilities, and bugs throughout the development lifecyclehigh · 76%
- GitGuardianDetect and prevent credential exposure across your code and infrastructuremedium · 72%
- Endor LabsAutomates vulnerability detection and remediation using AI agents integrated into developer workflowsmedium · 71%
- SemgrepVulnerability scanner for modern developmentmedium · 71%
- MendUnified platform for securing custom code, open source dependencies, and AI with automated governance and remediationmedium · 74%
Compare StackHawk
Side by side against other devsecops tools, attribute by attribute, with a source on every value.
The vioscaleAI score: one lens on the evidence
Not user reviews and not a paid placement: a confidence-weighted blend of the independent signals below (adoption, activity, security posture, and more), which you can sort and re-weight yourself. Vendors can correct their listing but can never move their rank, and stars are weighted low as a vanity metric. It is one way to read the evidence for StackHawk, not the verdict.
| Signal | Score | Weight | Contribution | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security posture | 45 | 0.21 | 9.4 | ✓ |
| Reliability | 50 | 0.09 | 4.7 | ✓ |
| Capabilities | 75 | 0.05 | 3.8 | ✓ |
| Price level | 80 | 0.04 | 3.4 | ✓ |
| Pricing transparency | 45 | 0.05 | 2.3 | ✓ |
| Integrations | 31 | 0.05 | 1.6 | ✓ |
Computed . Re-weight it by intent, or see the full method.
All data & sourcesshow ↓
Every value we hold, with its source, retrieval date, and confidence. This is the evidence behind the score: don't trust it, verify it.
Content
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Faq | 6 items | mediumsource · 2026-09-10 · 62% |
Features
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Capabilities | Dast: Yes · Hosting: cloud · Ci native: Yes · Ide plugin: Yes · Auto fix pr: Yes · Open source: Yes | mediumsource · 2026-08-14 · 60% |
Integrations
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Count | 11 | mediumsource · 2026-08-14 · 60% |
Market
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Availability | PrimaryMarkets: … · AvailabilityScope: global · AvailableCountries: … · NotAvailableCountries: … | highsource · 2026-08-14 · 75% |
Pricing
Reliability
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Status page | Yes | mediumsource · 2026-08-03 · 60% |
Security
Is StackHawk the right choice for you?
Tell us the job, the constraints and what you weigh most, and we will rank StackHawk against the rest of the devsecops tools we index, using the same dated evidence weighted your way.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Is this your product?
This profile was built from public sources without asking you. You can take the badge below and use it anywhere, and you can claim the profile to correct anything we got wrong. Both are free, and neither moves StackHawk up or down: nobody can buy rank here, including you.
Take the badge
Live, always current, and free to use on your own site. It shows StackHawk's independent score and links back to this profile.
<a href="https://www.vioscale.ai/software/stackhawk" target="_blank" rel="noopener">
<img src="https://www.vioscale.ai/badge/software/stackhawk.svg" alt="StackHawk, verified on vioscaleAI" width="330" height="76" loading="lazy" />
</a>Markdown, for a README →
[](https://www.vioscale.ai/software/stackhawk)Claim the profile
Verify you control the domain and you can correct the facts, add the sources we should be reading, and see how AI assistants are describing StackHawk. Free, and it does not change the score.
- Correct anything wrong, with evidence
- Point our crawler at the pages that matter
- See which AI systems are reading this profile
Not the owner? How vendor profiles work