Endor Labs vs StackHawk
On the evidence we track, Endor Labs leads this comparison with a composite score of 65/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for devsecops tools. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Endor Labs
LeaderAn application security platform that uses AI agents to identify and fix vulnerabilities in code and dependencies with context-aware analysis. It prioritizes reachable, exploitable vulnerabilities and integrates directly into developer tools and CI pipelines to reduce manual triage.
StackHawk
Platform that automatically tests running applications for vulnerabilities within AI coding workflows, identifies exploitable issues, and provides automated fixes before code is committed.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Endor Labs
LeaderFree Developer tier; paid Team and Enterprise tiers for organizations
- Developer EditionFree
- SAST
- SCA
- secrets detection
- malicious package detection
- CLI tool
- +1 more
- TeamContact sales
- Shared policies
- Centralized reporting
- Team management
- Web UI
- EnterpriseContact sales
- AURI Agents for autonomous remediation
- Full-stack reachability analysis
- Custom security policies
- REST API
- SIEM integrations
- +1 more
StackHawk
From $10/user/month (Wingman). 14-day free trial. Scale plan available via sales consultation.
- Wingman$10/user/month
- Works inside Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot
- Auto-configures and boots app
- Runtime testing against running app
- Finds and fixes vulnerabilities in same session
- Auto-rescanning to verify fix
- +3 more
- ScaleContact sales
- Everything in Wingman
- Attack surface discovery
- Sensitive data detection
- Deeper, broader scan coverage
- Program reporting (coverage, fix rates by team)
- +2 more
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
- GitHub
- GitLab
- Cursor
- Claude Code
- CircleCI
Endor Labs
Leader- BitBucket
- Azure DevOps
- AWS Marketplace
- Microsoft Azure
- Google Cloud Marketplace
- Wiz
- Cursor AI
- Microsoft Defender for Cloud
- VS Code
- Windsurf
- Defender for Cloud
- Microsoft Defender
StackHawk
- Codex
- Gemini CLI
- GitHub Copilot
- OpenCode
- Snyk
- Auth0
- GitHub Actions
- Jenkins
- Antigravity
Endor Labs or StackHawk: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.