What is Woodpecker CI?
An open source continuous integration and deployment platform that uses Docker containers to execute pipeline steps on self-hosted distributed agents. It supports multiple workflows, dynamic scaling, and extensibility through a plugin ecosystem.
Woodpecker CI pricing
We don't have Woodpecker CI's full plan breakdown yet (its pricing page resisted automated reading). Here's what we could confirm. Always check live pricing for exact numbers.
Free and open source
What Woodpecker CI does
The capabilities that matter for ci/cd tools, normalised so it lines up with every alternative. “-” means we haven't confirmed it, not that it's missing.
- Hosting
- Self-hosted only
- Self-hosted runners
- ✓
- Config-as-code pipelines
- ✓
- Matrix / parallel builds
- -
- Container-native builds
- ✓
- Build caching
- -
- Secrets management
- -
- Deployment environments & approvals
- -
- Reusable actions / marketplace
- ✓
Platform & deployment
Independently observed- Web
- Self-hosted
Security & compliance
Known vulnerabilities: 3 (1 in the last 12 months), max severity HIGH sourcea count reflects scale & disclosure, not quality
Woodpecker CI alternatives
Other ci/cd tools we track, ranked by the same independent score.
- Travis CIAutomated testing and deployment platform for developerslow · 19%
- GitHub ActionsA platform for automating software development workflows with CI/CD built directly into GitHub repositoriesmedium · 74%
- Argo CDlow · 43%
- CircleCIAutomated testing and deployment platform that validates code continuously and keeps software delivery pipelines running with minimal manual intervention.medium · 73%
- SemaphoreA fast, open-source platform for automating software builds and deploymentsmedium · 71%
- Semaphore CImedium · 62%
The Vioscale score: one lens on the evidence
Not user reviews and not a paid placement: a confidence-weighted blend of the independent signals below (adoption, activity, security posture, and more), which you can sort and re-weight yourself. Vendors can correct their listing but can never move their rank, and stars are weighted low as a vanity metric. It is one way to read the evidence for Woodpecker CI, not the verdict.
| Signal | Score | Weight | Contribution | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Development activity | 63 | 0.11 | 6.8 | ✓ |
| Capabilities | 67 | 0.09 | 5.9 | ✓ |
| Release cadence | 87 | 0.07 | 5.9 | ✓ |
| Security score | 61 | 0.08 | 4.9 | ✓ |
| Stars | 73 | 0.03 | 2.0 | ✓ |
| Dependent projects | 12 | 0.07 | 0.8 | ✓ |
| Integrations | 0 | 0.05 | 0.0 | - |
| Security posture | 0 | 0.18 | 0.0 | - |
| Package downloads | 0 | 0.15 | 0.0 | - |
| Developer Q&A activity | 0 | 0.05 | 0.0 | - |
Computed . Re-weight it by intent, or see the full method.
All data & sourcesshow ↓
Every value we hold, with its source, retrieval date, and confidence. This is the evidence behind the score: don't trust it, verify it.
Activity
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Commits last 30d | 100 | mediumsource · 2026-08-26 · 65% |
Adoption
Features
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Capabilities | Hosting: self · Marketplace: Yes · Yaml pipelines: Yes · Container native: Yes · Self hosted runners: Yes | mediumsource · 2026-08-16 · 60% |
Language
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Primary | Go | highsource · 2026-08-26 · 90% |
License
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Spdx | Apache-2.0 | highsource · 2026-08-26 · 95% |