Comparison

Semaphore vs Woodpecker CI

On the evidence we track, Semaphore leads this comparison with a composite score of 68/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.

Machine formatsJSONMarkdownGraphQLor send Accept: application/json
Semaphore68
Woodpecker CI60
Score
Vioscale score
Semaphore68 / 100medium · 71%
Woodpecker CI60 / 100low · 43%
Pricing
Free tier
Semaphore
Woodpecker CI
Model
Semaphorefreemium
Woodpecker CIopen_source
Price level
Semaphorelow
Woodpecker CIfree
Transparent
Semaphore
Woodpecker CI
Integrations
Count
Semaphore1
Woodpecker CI
Security
Iso27001
Semaphore
Woodpecker CI
Pci
Semaphore
Woodpecker CI
Scorecard
Semaphore
Woodpecker CI6.1
Soc2
Semaphore
Woodpecker CI
Reliability
Status page
Semaphore
Woodpecker CI
Adoption
Dependent repos
Semaphore
Woodpecker CI4
Github stars
Semaphore
Woodpecker CI7,753
Activity
Commits last 30d
Semaphore
Woodpecker CI100
Release
Cadence days
Semaphore
Woodpecker CI23
History
Semaphore
Woodpecker CI20 items
License
Spdx
Semaphore
Woodpecker CIApache-2.0
Language
Primary
Semaphore
Woodpecker CIGo

Capabilities

Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for ci/cd tools. “-” means undocumented, not absent.

Deployment
Hosting
Semaphore-
Woodpecker CISelf-hosted only
Self-hosted runners
Semaphore
Woodpecker CI
Core
Config-as-code pipelines
Semaphore
Woodpecker CI
Matrix / parallel builds
Semaphore
Woodpecker CI-
Build
Container-native builds
Semaphore
Woodpecker CI
Performance
Build caching
Semaphore-
Woodpecker CI-
Security
Secrets management
Semaphore-
Woodpecker CI-
Delivery
Deployment environments & approvals
Semaphore-
Woodpecker CI-
Ecosystem
Reusable actions / marketplace
Semaphore-
Woodpecker CI

What each one is

The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.

Semaphore

Leader

An all-in-one continuous integration and delivery system that enables teams to automate testing and deployment workflows. It supports containerized and cloud-native architectures and can be deployed as a managed cloud service or self-hosted.

Independently observed

Woodpecker CI

An open source continuous integration and deployment platform that uses Docker containers to execute pipeline steps on self-hosted distributed agents. It supports multiple workflows, dynamic scaling, and extensibility through a plugin ecosystem.

Independently observed

Pricing

List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.

Semaphore

Leader
from $0.00/moUsage-basedFree tier

Pay-per-minute metered compute: $0.0025/min (self-hosted) to $0.09/min (MacOS). Includes 20 concurrent jobs, $15/month free credits, 9.6 GB cache, and free support. Optional modular support and success services.

  • Compute - Ubuntu ARM$0.003–$0.012/min depending on vCPU
  • Compute - Ubuntu x64$0.0075–$0.015/min depending on vCPU
  • Compute - MacOS$0.09/min
  • Compute - Self-Hosted$0.0025/min
as of verify ↗

Woodpecker CI

Open sourceFree tier

Free and open source

as of verify ↗

Platform & deployment

Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.

Platforms
Web
Semaphore
Woodpecker CI
Deployment
Cloud / SaaS
Semaphore
Woodpecker CI
Self-hosted
Semaphore
Woodpecker CI

Integrations

What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.

Semaphore

Leader
1 total
  • Flowdock
Independently observed

Woodpecker CI

Not documented yet.

Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.

Semaphore vs Woodpecker CI: an evidence-based comparison · Vioscale