Bitbucket
Code & CI/CD, powered by AI and the Atlassian platform
- Also known as
- bitbucket
What is Bitbucket?
A Git solution for teams using Jira that accelerates software delivery with AI-powered code review, integrated CI/CD pipelines, and governance tools.
Bitbucket pricing
Plans, per-tier features and add-ons, dated and linked to live pricing. Pricing changes often; always verify at source before you rely on it.
From $3.65/user/month. Free tier for up to 5 users.
Free
FreeFree forever for up to 5 users
- users
- up to 5
- git_lfs
- 1 GB
- build_minutes
- 50/month
- workspace_storage
- 1 GB
- deployment_environments
- 10
- Unlimited private repositories
- CI/CD with Bitbucket Pipelines
- Unlimited pull request reviewers
- Merge checks
- Jira integration
- Code insights (up to 3 integrations)
- Self-hosted runners (1 build slot)
Standard
For growing teams to collaborate on code and CI/CD
- users
- unlimited
- git_lfs
- 5 GB
- build_minutes
- 2,500/month
- package_storage
- 1 GB
- workspace_storage
- unlimited
- deployment_environments
- 100
- Unlimited private repositories
- CI/CD with Bitbucket Pipelines
- Unlimited pull request reviewers
- Merge checks
- Jira integration
- Code insights (unlimited integrations)
- Self-hosted runners (1 build slot, $15/additional)
- AI-powered pull request descriptions
Premium
Accelerate velocity with AI & automation
- users
- unlimited
- git_lfs
- 10 GB
- build_minutes
- 3,500/month
- package_storage
- 2 GB
- workspace_storage
- unlimited
- deployment_environments
- 100
- Unlimited private repositories
- CI/CD with Bitbucket Pipelines
- Unlimited pull request reviewers
- Merge checks
- Jira integration
- Code insights (unlimited integrations)
- Self-hosted runners (2 build slots, $15/additional)
- AI-powered pull request descriptions
- AI code review
Add-ons
- Additional build minutes$10/mo
- Additional Git LFS storage$10/mo
- Self-hosted runner slot$15/mo
- Package storage overage$0.35 per GB
- Network transfer overage$0.70 per GB
What Bitbucket does
The capabilities that matter for version control, normalised so it lines up with every alternative. “-” means we haven't confirmed it, not that it's missing.
- VCS model
- Distributed
- Underlying VCS supported (Git / Mercurial / SVN / Perforce / multiple)
- Git
- Hosting
- Cloud + self-hosted
- Code review
- PR / MR
- Large-file / binary handling
- Git LFS
- Monorepo scale (partial clone / sparse / VFS)
- -
- Built-in CI
- ✓
- Access control granularity
- Branch
- Federation / decentralisation (ActivityPub / email)
- -
- Open-source core
- Closed
- Self-managed license model
- Seat-priced EE
- API surface (REST / GraphQL / webhooks)
- -
- SSO / SAML / SCIM
- -
- Signed commits / supply-chain (GPG / SSH / sigstore)
- -
Platform & deployment
Independently observed- CLI
- Web
- Cloud / SaaS
- Self-hosted
Integrations (3)
Independently observed- Jira
- Jira Service Management
- Rovo
Bitbucket alternatives
Other version control we track, ranked by the same independent score.
- GitA free and open source distributed version control systemlow · 6%
- ForgejoBeyond coding. We forge.low · 3%
- MercurialWork easier, Work fasterlow · 8%
- GerritThe open source, patchset based, code review platform for Git-based developmentlow · 29%
- FossilA Coherent Software Configuration Management Systemlow · 14%
- Apache SubversionEnterprise-class centralized version control for the masseslow · 10%
The Vioscale score: one lens on the evidence
Not user reviews and not a paid placement: a confidence-weighted blend of the independent signals below (adoption, activity, security posture, and more), which you can sort and re-weight yourself. Vendors can correct their listing but can never move their rank, and stars are weighted low as a vanity metric. It is one way to read the evidence for Bitbucket, not the verdict.
| Signal | Score | Weight | Contribution | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing Transparency | 100 | 8.00 | 800.0 | ✓ |
| Security Posture | 45 | 13.00 | 585.0 | ✓ |
| Price Level | 80 | 6.00 | 480.0 | ✓ |
| Capabilities | 29 | 16.00 | 462.5 | ✓ |
| Reliability | 50 | 8.00 | 400.0 | ✓ |
| Integrations | 17 | 8.00 | 138.5 | ✓ |
Computed . Re-weight it by intent, or see the full method.
All data & sourcesshow ↓
Every value we hold, with its source, retrieval date, and confidence. This is the evidence behind the score: don't trust it, verify it.
Features
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Capabilities | {"hosting":"both","vcs_model":"distributed","large_file":"git_lfs","built_in_ci":true,"code_review":"pr_mr","license_model":"seat_priced_ee","access_control":"branch","underlying_vcs":"Git","open_source_core":"closed"} | mediumsource · 2026-08-01 · 60% |
Integrations
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Count | 3 | mediumsource · 2026-08-01 · 60% |
Pricing
Reliability
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Status page | Yes | mediumsource · 2026-08-01 · 60% |