Comparison

Bitbucket vs Codeberg

No clear leader: Bitbucket (59.0) and Codeberg (57.8) are within the 5-point margin; treat as a tie. The attribute-by-attribute breakdown below, with a source and date on every value, is the honest way to compare them.

Machine formatsJSONMarkdownGraphQLor send Accept: application/json
Bitbucket59
Codeberg58
Score
Vioscale score
Bitbucket59 / 100medium · 71%
Codeberg58 / 100low · 44%
Pricing
Free tier
Bitbucket
Codeberg
Model
Bitbucketfreemium
Codebergfree
Price level
Bitbucketlow
Codebergfree
Transparent
Bitbucket
Codeberg
Integrations
Count
Bitbucket50
Codeberg3
Security
Disclosure policy
Bitbucket
Codeberg
Gdpr
Bitbucket
Codeberg
Soc2
Bitbucket
Codeberg
Reliability
Status page
Bitbucket
Codeberg

Capabilities

Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for version control. “-” means undocumented, not absent.

Model
VCS model
BitbucketCentralized
CodebergDistributed
Underlying VCS supported (Git / Mercurial / SVN / Perforce / multiple)
BitbucketGit
CodebergGit
Deployment
Hosting
BitbucketCloud + self-hosted
CodebergCloud only
Review
Code review
BitbucketPR / MR
CodebergPR / MR
Storage
Large-file / binary handling
BitbucketGit LFS
Codeberg-
Scale
Monorepo scale (partial clone / sparse / VFS)
Bitbucket-
Codeberg-
DevOps
Built-in CI
Bitbucket
Codeberg
Access
Access control granularity
BitbucketBranch
Codeberg-
Federation
Federation / decentralisation (ActivityPub / email)
Bitbucket-
Codeberg-
Licensing
Open-source core
Bitbucket-
CodebergOpen-source
Self-managed license model
Bitbucket-
CodebergFree
Integration
API surface (REST / GraphQL / webhooks)
Bitbucket-
Codeberg-
Enterprise
SSO / SAML / SCIM
Bitbucket-
Codeberg-
Security
Signed commits / supply-chain (GPG / SSH / sigstore)
Bitbucket-
Codeberg-

What each one is

The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.

Bitbucket

A web-based platform that manages Git repositories alongside continuous integration and deployment automation, with tight integration for team project coordination and code review management with governance controls.

Independently observed

Codeberg

A volunteer-run platform offering free infrastructure services—including code repositories, CI/CD pipelines, and project hosting—exclusively for free and open-source software projects.

Independently observed

Pricing

List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.

Bitbucket

from $3.65/moHybridFree tier

Free up to 5 users; Standard from $3.65/user/mo; Premium from $7.25/user/mo; Data Center by quote

  • FreeFree
    • Unlimited public and private repositories
    • 1 GB LFS file storage
    • 50 build minutes per month
  • Standard$3.65 per user per month
    • All current Bitbucket features
    • Git LFS
    • Bitbucket Pipelines
  • Premium$7.25 per user per month
    • All Standard features
    • Merge checks
    • IP allowlisting
    • Deployment permissions
    • Required two-step verification
    • +2 more
  • Data CenterContact sales
    • Self-managed infrastructure deployment
    • Custom data management and compliance controls
    • Bitbucket Hybrid License option for existing Data Center users
as of verify ↗

Codeberg

FreeFree tier

Completely free for all free and open-source software projects

as of verify ↗

Platform & deployment

Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.

Platforms
Web
Bitbucket
Codeberg
CLI
Bitbucket
Codeberg
Deployment
Cloud / SaaS
Bitbucket
Codeberg
Self-hosted
Bitbucket
Codeberg
On-premise
Bitbucket
Codeberg
Hybrid
Bitbucket
Codeberg

Integrations

What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.

Bitbucket

8 total
  • Jira
  • Jira Service Management
  • Rovo
  • Teamwork Graph
  • Slack
  • Opsgenie
  • Amazon S3
  • SonarCloud
Independently observed

Codeberg

3 total
  • Forgejo
  • Woodpecker CI
  • Weblate
Independently observed

Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.