OmniFocus vs Todoist
On the evidence we track, Todoist leads this comparison with a composite score of 47/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for task management. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
OmniFocus
A task and project management application that enables users to organize actions and projects across multiple devices with features like tagging, scheduling, location-based views, calendar integration, and customizable perspectives.
Todoist
LeaderA productivity app that enables users to capture and organize tasks through natural language input across multiple devices. It supports project management, team collaboration, and offers flexible views including lists, calendars, and boards for tracking work and goals.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
OmniFocus
- Spark
- Apple Calendar
- Siri
Todoist
Leader- Claude
- Google Calendar
- ChatGPT
- Outlook
- Fantastical
- Slack
- Zapier
OmniFocus or Todoist: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.