Easy!Appointments vs Mindbody
No clear leader: Easy!Appointments (33.5) and Mindbody (31.9) are within the 5-point margin; treat as a tie. The attribute-by-attribute breakdown below, with a source and date on every value, is the honest way to compare them.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for appointment booking. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Easy!Appointments
An open-source appointment scheduling platform that you host on your own servers, providing full control over bookings and customizable workflows for various business needs.
Mindbody
A cloud-based management system for fitness and wellness studios that combines scheduling, client management, payment processing, and point-of-sale functionality. Includes marketing automation and dynamic pricing tools to optimize class attendance and revenue.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Easy!Appointments
Free open source software
- Open SourceFree
- Customers and appointments management
- Services and providers organization
- Working plan and booking rules
- Google Calendar synchronization
- Email notifications system
- +3 more
Mindbody
From £89/month per location
- Small Business£89/month per location
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
Easy!Appointments
- Google Calendar
Mindbody
- Squarespace
- Wix
- WordPress
- Stripe
Easy!Appointments or Mindbody: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.