WAF
Top signal weightsIntegrations 0.16Package downloads 0.14Development activity 0.09Capabilities 0.08
Rank by intent
Ranking basisBest valuePackage downloads 0.14Integrations 0.14Price level 0.14Github activity 0.08
Same facts, re-weighted. Only the weighting changes, never the underlying evidence.
| # | Software | Score | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fastly Next-Gen WAFDistributed web application and API security platform deployable anywhere your infrastructure lives | 70 | low · 35% |
| 2 | AWS WAFA cloud-native web application firewall that protects web applications and APIs from web-based attacks | 65 | medium · 62% |
| 3 | Cloudflare WAFAn edge-deployed security layer that inspects incoming web traffic and prevents attacks before they reach your applications | 55 | medium · 54% |
| 4 | Coraza | 54 | low · 35% |
| 5 | ModSecurity | 47 | low · 24% |
| 6 | Imperva WAF | 22 | low · 2% |
| 7 | Barracuda Web Application FirewallDefend applications and APIs against cyber threats with intelligent attack detection and prevention | 16 | low · 21% |
Ranked by the Vioscale composite: independent signals, not user reviews. See the method.
WAF compared
Head-to-head on the attributes that matter here, with a source and date on every value.
- AWS WAFvsFastly Next-Gen WAF61/67
- Cloudflare WAFvsFastly Next-Gen WAF57/67
- CorazavsFastly Next-Gen WAF46/67
- Fastly Next-Gen WAFvsModSecurity67/32
- Fastly Next-Gen WAFvsImperva WAF67/22
- AWS WAFvsCloudflare WAF61/57
- AWS WAFvsCoraza61/46
- AWS WAFvsModSecurity61/32
- AWS WAFvsImperva WAF61/22
- Cloudflare WAFvsCoraza57/46