Coraza vs Fastly Next-Gen WAF
No leader: the top candidate Coraza has only 0.21 confidence (low), below the 0.35 needed to declare a winner. The attribute-by-attribute breakdown below, with a source and date on every value, is the honest way to compare them.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for waf. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Coraza
A web application firewall that provides enterprise-grade threat protection for APIs, applications, and legacy systems, with minimal performance overhead and support for custom rules and integrations.
Fastly Next-Gen WAF
A cloud-native security solution that protects web applications and APIs from advanced threats including credential-based account takeovers, malicious bots, and API abuse, providing real-time visibility and DevOps toolchain integration.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
Coraza
- NGINX
- Envoy
- Apache APISIX
Fastly Next-Gen WAF
- Slack
- PagerDuty
- Jira
- Elastic
- Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Coraza or Fastly Next-Gen WAF: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.