Available in: US, EU, AU · Popular in: US
What is wrk?
A lightweight benchmarking tool that generates high-volume network traffic to measure HTTP server performance, using multithreaded design and efficient event notification mechanisms
wrk pricing
Plans, per-tier features and add-ons, dated and linked to live pricing. Pricing changes often; always verify at source before you rely on it.
Free tier available. Pro starts at $4/user/month. Enterprise Cloud and add-ons available on contact.
Free
FreePublic repositories with basic features
- ci_cd_minutes
- 2000/mo
- Public repositories
- 2000 CI/CD minutes/month
- Community support
- Dependabot security updates
Pro
Private repositories and advanced features
- ci_cd_minutes
- 3000/mo
- Private repositories
- 3000 CI/CD minutes/month
- Web-based support
Team
Collaboration features for small teams
- ci_cd_minutes
- 3000/mo
- Team collaboration
- 3000 CI/CD minutes/month
- Advanced project management
Enterprise Cloud
Contact salesMulti-organization management, SSO, audit logs, SLA support
- ci_cd_minutes
- 50000/mo
- 50000 CI/CD minutes/month
- SAML SSO
- Audit log API
- Enterprise account with multi-org management
- SOC2 Type II compliance
- Premium support with 30-min SLA on urgent tickets
- 24/7 web and phone support
- Customer Reliability Engineer option
Add-ons
- GitHub Copilot$10/mo
- Copilot Pro$20/mo
- Codespaces$0.18 per core-hour + $0.07 per GB
- Advanced Security
- Code Quality$10/committer/mo
What wrk does
The capabilities that matter for load testing, normalised so it lines up with every alternative. “-” means we haven't confirmed it, not that it's missing.
- Browser based load
- ✓
- Ci cd native
- ✓
- Apm observability output
- -
- Correlation parameterization
- -
- Recording scriptless creation
- -
- Realtime dashboard
- -
- Open source
- ✓
Platform & deployment
Independently observed- CLI
- Self-hosted
Integrations (18)
Independently observed- CircleCI⇄
- Azure Pipelines⇄
- Codemagic CI/CD⇄
- Render→
- Mergify⇄
- Zenhub⇄
- Zube⇄
- Linear Code⇄
- Rollbar←
- Codacy←
- CodeFactor←
- DeepScan←
- PullRequest←
- GuardRails←
- WakaTime←
- POEditor⇄
- Qlty Cloud←
- OpenCode←
Security & compliance
Independently observed- SOC 2 Type II · Type IIactive
Known vulnerabilities: 0 (0 in the last 12 months) sourcea count reflects scale & disclosure, not quality
wrk FAQ
Common questions about wrk, answered from independent, dated evidence.
What is wrk?
An open-source HTTP load testing utility designed to generate significant network traffic from a single multi-core machine. It uses multithreaded design with scalable event notification systems and supports custom scripting via LuaJIT for request generation and response processing. It is indexed under Load Testing.
Source: https://github.com/pricing
Is wrk free to use?
wrk is open source, so it can be self-hosted and used at no licence cost. Pricing changes often, so verify at source before relying on it.
Source: https://github.com/pricing
What platforms does wrk support?
wrk supports macOS, Linux and a command-line interface. Platforms we have not confirmed are simply not listed here rather than ruled out.
Source: https://github.com/pricing
Can wrk be self-hosted?
Yes. wrk can be deployed self-hosted, so it does not have to run on the vendor's infrastructure.
Source: https://github.com/pricing
wrk alternatives
Other load testing we track, ranked by the same independent score.
- Apache JMeterA Java-based load testing tool that simulates server traffic to evaluate application performance under heavy usagelow · 28%
- OpenText LoadRunnerlow · 3%
- BlazeMeterAutomated performance and API testing platform that uses AI to orchestrate testing workflows without manual scriptingmedium · 57%
- vegetaCommand-line HTTP load testing tool with library supportlow · 35%
- NeoLoadAn AI-powered platform that automates performance and load testing with continuous CI/CD integrationlow · 19%
- WebLOADLoad testing platform proven through decades of enterprise uselow · 20%
Compare wrk
Side by side against other load testing, attribute by attribute, with a source on every value.
The vioscaleAI score: one lens on the evidence
Not user reviews and not a paid placement: a confidence-weighted blend of the independent signals below (adoption, activity, security posture, and more), which you can sort and re-weight yourself. Vendors can correct their listing but can never move their rank, and stars are weighted low as a vanity metric. It is one way to read the evidence for wrk, not the verdict.
| Signal | Score | Weight | Contribution | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capabilities | 58 | 0.08 | 4.8 | ✓ |
| Security posture | 40 | 0.09 | 3.5 | ✓ |
| Stars | 87 | 0.03 | 2.9 | ✓ |
| Dependent projects | 32 | 0.08 | 2.5 | ✓ |
| Integrations | 37 | 0.05 | 1.9 | ✓ |
| Development activity | 0 | 0.12 | 0.0 | ✓ |
| Release cadence | 0 | 0.07 | 0.0 | - |
| Package downloads | 0 | 0.17 | 0.0 | - |
| Security score | 0 | 0.05 | 0.0 | - |
| Developer Q&A activity | 0 | 0.08 | 0.0 | - |
Computed . Re-weight it by intent, or see the full method.
All data & sourcesshow ↓
Every value we hold, with its source, retrieval date, and confidence. This is the evidence behind the score: don't trust it, verify it.
Activity
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Commits last 30d | 0 | mediumsource · 2026-10-15 · 65% |
Adoption
Content
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Faq | 4 items | mediumsource · 2026-09-10 · 60% |
Features
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Capabilities | Open source, Ci cd native, Browser based load | mediumsource · 2026-10-15 · 60% |
Integrations
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Count | 18 | mediumsource · 2026-09-14 · 60% |
Language
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Primary | C | highsource · 2026-10-15 · 90% |
Market
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Availability | PrimaryMarkets: … · AvailabilityScope: regional · AvailableCountries: … · NotAvailableCountries: … | highsource · 2026-09-14 · 75% |
Pricing
Security
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Vulnerabilities | Count: 0 · Source: https://advisories.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/advisories?ecosystem=homebrew&package_name=wrk&per_page=100 · Last 12m: 0 | highsource · 2026-10-15 · 90% |
| Trust center | https://github.com/security | mediumsource · 2026-10-15 · 60% |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II | mediumsource · 2026-09-14 · 60% |
| Soc2 | Yes | highsource · 2026-09-14 · 75% |
Is wrk the right choice for you?
Tell us the job, the constraints and what you weigh most, and we will rank wrk against the rest of the load testing we index, using the same dated evidence weighted your way.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Is this your product?
This profile was built from public sources without asking you. You can take the badge below and use it anywhere, and you can claim the profile to correct anything we got wrong. Both are free, and neither moves wrk up or down: nobody can buy rank here, including you.
Take the badge
Live, always current, and free to use on your own site. It shows wrk's independent score and links back to this profile.
<a href="https://www.vioscale.ai/software/wrk" target="_blank" rel="noopener">
<img src="https://www.vioscale.ai/badge/software/wrk.svg" alt="wrk, verified on vioscaleAI" width="330" height="76" loading="lazy" />
</a>Markdown, for a README →
[](https://www.vioscale.ai/software/wrk)Claim the profile
Verify you control the domain, then point us at the pages that state the facts about wrk and add your own description and media. Free, and it does not change the score.
- Correct anything wrong, with evidence
- Point our crawler at the pages that matter
- Write your own description and add media
Not the owner? How vendor profiles work