What is Upptime?
An open-source monitoring tool that uses GitHub Actions to check website availability at regular intervals and maintains a status page showing uptime history and incident reports. Downtime alerts are sent to notification services and incident data is stored version-controlled in a GitHub repository.
Upptime pricing
We don't have Upptime's full plan breakdown yet (its pricing page resisted automated reading). Here's what we could confirm. Always check live pricing for exact numbers.
Platform & deployment
Independently observed- Web
- Cloud / SaaS
- Self-hosted
Integrations (8)
Independently observed- Slack
- Telegram
- GitHub Actions
- GitHub Issues
- GitHub Pages
- GitHub API
- Globalping
- custom webhooks
Security & compliance
Known vulnerabilities: 0 (0 in the last 12 months) sourcea count reflects scale & disclosure, not quality
Upptime alternatives
Other status pages we track, ranked by the same independent score.
- OneUptimehigh · 75%
- HundAn automated status page platform that keeps your customers informed about service health in real timemedium · 74%
- Cachetlow · 20%
- Atlassian StatuspageNotify customers of service disruptions and real-time status updates across multiple channelslow · 42%
- StatusPalTrack system health, manage incidents, and communicate status updates to stakeholders from one dashboardhigh · 76%
- Sorryâ„¢ AppHosted status page platform for communicating system status and incidents to customerslow · 42%
Compare Upptime
Side by side against other status pages, attribute by attribute, with a source on every value.
The Vioscale score: one lens on the evidence
Not user reviews and not a paid placement: a confidence-weighted blend of the independent signals below (adoption, activity, security posture, and more), which you can sort and re-weight yourself. Vendors can correct their listing but can never move their rank, and stars are weighted low as a vanity metric. It is one way to read the evidence for Upptime, not the verdict.
| Signal | Score | Weight | Contribution | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing transparency | 80 | 0.08 | 6.7 | ✓ |
| Development activity | 63 | 0.09 | 5.9 | ✓ |
| Price level | 100 | 0.05 | 5.2 | ✓ |
| Integrations | 27 | 0.09 | 2.6 | ✓ |
| Stars | 80 | 0.03 | 2.1 | ✓ |
| Security score | 45 | 0.04 | 1.9 | ✓ |
| Reliability | 0 | 0.07 | 0.0 | - |
| Capabilities | 0 | 0.08 | 0.0 | - |
| Dependent projects | 0 | 0.06 | 0.0 | ✓ |
| Release cadence | 0 | 0.05 | 0.0 | - |
| Security posture | 0 | 0.07 | 0.0 | - |
| Package downloads | 0 | 0.14 | 0.0 | - |
| Developer Q&A activity | 0 | 0.06 | 0.0 | - |
Computed . Re-weight it by intent, or see the full method.
All data & sourcesshow ↓
Every value we hold, with its source, retrieval date, and confidence. This is the evidence behind the score: don't trust it, verify it.
Activity
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Commits last 30d | 100 | mediumsource · 2026-08-26 · 65% |
Adoption
Integrations
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Count | 8 | mediumsource · 2026-08-19 · 60% |
Language
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Primary | Markdown | highsource · 2026-08-26 · 90% |
License
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Spdx | MIT | highsource · 2026-08-26 · 95% |
Pricing
Release
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| History | 20 items | mediumsource · 2026-08-26 · 70% |