What is Statping-ng?
A self-hosted status page and monitoring platform that tracks the availability of HTTP, TCP, UDP, ICMP, and gRPC services with customizable dashboards, notifications, and mobile app support.
Statping-ng pricing
We don't have Statping-ng's full plan breakdown yet (its pricing page resisted automated reading). Here's what we could confirm. Always check live pricing for exact numbers.
Platform & deployment
Independently observed- CLI
- iOS
- macOS
- Web
- Linux
- Android
- Windows
- Self-hosted
Integrations (8)
Independently observed- Slack
- Discord
- Telegram
- Twilio
- Webhooks
- GitHub
Security & compliance
Known vulnerabilities: 0 (0 in the last 12 months) sourcea count reflects scale & disclosure, not quality
Statping-ng alternatives
Other uptime monitoring we track, ranked by the same independent score.
- HetrixToolsMonitor server uptime and IP reputation with real-time alerts to prevent outages and blacklistinglow · 26%
- Better Stack UptimeIntegrated platform for monitoring applications, managing incidents, and coordinating on-call response with AI-native capabilitiesmedium · 60%
- Oh DearWebsite monitoring platform that alerts your team before clients notice outageslow · 42%
- Blackbox Exporterlow · 32%
- UptrendsGlobal synthetic monitoring to detect user-impacting service failures across web and API journeyslow · 26%
Compare Statping-ng
Side by side against other uptime monitoring, attribute by attribute, with a source on every value.
The Vioscale score: one lens on the evidence
Not user reviews and not a paid placement: a confidence-weighted blend of the independent signals below (adoption, activity, security posture, and more), which you can sort and re-weight yourself. Vendors can correct their listing but can never move their rank, and stars are weighted low as a vanity metric. It is one way to read the evidence for Statping-ng, not the verdict.
| Signal | Score | Weight | Contribution | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Release cadence | 78 | 0.05 | 4.0 | ✓ |
| Integrations | 27 | 0.07 | 1.9 | ✓ |
| Stars | 62 | 0.03 | 1.6 | ✓ |
| Security score | 32 | 0.04 | 1.3 | ✓ |
| Dependent projects | 20 | 0.06 | 1.2 | ✓ |
| Capabilities | 0 | 0.08 | 0.0 | - |
| Development activity | 0 | 0.09 | 0.0 | ✓ |
| Security posture | 0 | 0.07 | 0.0 | - |
| Package downloads | 0 | 0.14 | 0.0 | - |
| Developer Q&A activity | 0 | 0.06 | 0.0 | - |
Computed . Re-weight it by intent, or see the full method.
All data & sourcesshow ↓
Every value we hold, with its source, retrieval date, and confidence. This is the evidence behind the score: don't trust it, verify it.
Activity
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Commits last 30d | 0 | mediumsource · 2026-08-26 · 65% |
Adoption
Integrations
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Count | 8 | mediumsource · 2026-08-20 · 60% |
Language
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Primary | Go | highsource · 2026-08-26 · 90% |
License
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Spdx | GPL-3.0 | highsource · 2026-08-26 · 95% |