Review Board
A multi-purpose review and collaboration platform for code, documents, designs, and other file types
- Also known as
- review-board
Available worldwide
What is Review Board?
A code and content review platform that enables teams to conduct collaborative reviews across various file types—code, documents, designs, and graphics—with flexible workflows, approval controls, and integration capabilities across multiple repositories and tools.
Review Board pricing
We don't have Review Board's full plan breakdown yet (its pricing page resisted automated reading). Here's what we could confirm. Always check live pricing for exact numbers.
RBCommons managed hosting available for a monthly fee. Commercial support contracts available for self-hosted deployments.
Platform & deployment
Independently observed- Web
- Cloud / SaaS
- On-premise
- Air-gapped
- Self-hosted
Integrations (17)
Independently observed- GitHub
- GitLab
- Bitbucket Server
- Gerrit
- Git
- Jujutsu
- Perforce
- Subversion
- Mercurial
- ClearCase
- Azure DevOps
- CVS
- Breezy
- Asana
- Trello
- Mattermost
- I Done This
Review Board alternatives
Other code review tools we track, ranked by the same independent score.
- AxoloConnect GitHub pull requests to Slack for collaborative code reviews in one unified workspacemedium · 55%
- Korbit AIAutomated AI code review for GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucketmedium · 56%
- CodeRabbitAutomated code review platform powered by AI agents to validate pull requests at scalelow · 26%
- EllipsisCloud infrastructure for running AI coding agents with security isolation and cost controlslow · 43%
- BitoAI model routing platform that optimizes costs by directing requests to appropriately capable models, with integrated code reviews and technical design automatimedium · 56%
- GreptileAutomated code review using AI that understands your entire codebasemedium · 56%
Compare Review Board
Side by side against other code review tools, attribute by attribute, with a source on every value.
The Vioscale score: one lens on the evidence
Not user reviews and not a paid placement: a confidence-weighted blend of the independent signals below (adoption, activity, security posture, and more), which you can sort and re-weight yourself. Vendors can correct their listing but can never move their rank, and stars are weighted low as a vanity metric. It is one way to read the evidence for Review Board, not the verdict.
| Signal | Score | Weight | Contribution | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 50 | 0.07 | 3.7 | ✓ |
| Integrations | 35 | 0.04 | 1.4 | ✓ |
| Price level | 0 | 0.05 | 0.0 | - |
| Capabilities | 0 | 0.05 | 0.0 | - |
| Security posture | 5 | 0.07 | 0.0 | - |
| Pricing transparency | 0 | 0.08 | 0.0 | ✓ |
Computed . Re-weight it by intent, or see the full method.
All data & sourcesshow ↓
Every value we hold, with its source, retrieval date, and confidence. This is the evidence behind the score: don't trust it, verify it.
Integrations
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Count | 16 | mediumsource · 2026-08-18 · 60% |
Market
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Availability | PrimaryMarkets: … · AvailabilityScope: global · AvailableCountries: … · NotAvailableCountries: … | highsource · 2026-08-18 · 75% |
Pricing
Reliability
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Status page | Yes | mediumsource · 2026-08-18 · 60% |
Security
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Gdpr | Yes | highsource · 2026-08-18 · 75% |