Available worldwide
What is LitmusChaos?
A CNCF-hosted, cloud-native platform that enables teams to practice chaos engineering by running controlled experiments on their infrastructure and applications to discover vulnerabilities and improve resilience.
LitmusChaos pricing
We don't have LitmusChaos's full plan breakdown yet (its pricing page resisted automated reading). Here's what we could confirm. Always check live pricing for exact numbers.
Open source (no licensing cost)
Platform & deployment
Independently observed- CLI
- Web
- Linux
- Cloud / SaaS
- Hybrid
- On-premise
- Self-hosted
Integrations (4)
Independently observed- Kubernetes
- GCP
- Prometheus
- GitHub
Security & compliance
Known vulnerabilities: 0 (0 in the last 12 months) sourcea count reflects scale & disclosure, not quality
LitmusChaos alternatives
Other chaos engineering we track, ranked by the same independent score.
- AWS Fault Injection ServiceSafely test how your applications respond to failures using controlled experimentshigh · 76%
- Toxiproxyhigh · 80%
- PowerfulSealmedium · 56%
- Chaos Meshmedium · 58%
- Azure Chaos StudioStrengthen application robustness by deliberately injecting failures and simulating service outages in a controlled mannermedium · 61%
- Chaos Toolkitmedium · 59%
Compare LitmusChaos
Side by side against other chaos engineering, attribute by attribute, with a source on every value.
The Vioscale score: one lens on the evidence
Not user reviews and not a paid placement: a confidence-weighted blend of the independent signals below (adoption, activity, security posture, and more), which you can sort and re-weight yourself. Vendors can correct their listing but can never move their rank, and stars are weighted low as a vanity metric. It is one way to read the evidence for LitmusChaos, not the verdict.
| Signal | Score | Weight | Contribution | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price level | 100 | 0.05 | 5.2 | ✓ |
| Release cadence | 83 | 0.05 | 4.3 | ✓ |
| Development activity | 34 | 0.09 | 3.2 | ✓ |
| Security score | 70 | 0.04 | 2.9 | ✓ |
| Integrations | 20 | 0.09 | 1.9 | ✓ |
| Stars | 71 | 0.03 | 1.8 | ✓ |
| Dependent projects | 12 | 0.06 | 0.7 | ✓ |
| Reliability | 0 | 0.07 | 0.0 | - |
| Capabilities | 0 | 0.08 | 0.0 | - |
| Security posture | 0 | 0.07 | 0.0 | - |
| Package downloads | 0 | 0.14 | 0.0 | - |
| Pricing transparency | 0 | 0.08 | 0.0 | - |
| Developer Q&A activity | 0 | 0.06 | 0.0 | - |
Computed . Re-weight it by intent, or see the full method.
All data & sourcesshow ↓
Every value we hold, with its source, retrieval date, and confidence. This is the evidence behind the score: don't trust it, verify it.
Activity
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Commits last 30d | 11 | mediumsource · 2026-08-26 · 65% |
Adoption
Integrations
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Count | 4 | mediumsource · 2026-08-18 · 60% |
Language
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Primary | Go | highsource · 2026-08-26 · 90% |
License
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Spdx | Apache-2.0 | highsource · 2026-08-26 · 95% |
Market
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Availability | PrimaryMarkets: … · AvailabilityScope: global · AvailableCountries: … · NotAvailableCountries: … | highsource · 2026-08-18 · 75% |