Guild AI
A control plane for managing, monitoring, and governing AI agents across an organization
- Also known as
- guild-ai
What is Guild AI?
A platform that provides unified deployment, governance, and observability for AI agents regardless of which model or framework is used, enabling teams to track costs, control access, and maintain visibility across all their agents.
What Guild AI does
The capabilities that matter for experiment tracking, normalised so it lines up with every alternative. “-” means we haven't confirmed it, not that it's missing.
- Deployment model
- Managed SaaS
- Open source
- ✗
- Metrics and artifact logging
- ✓
- Native hyperparameter sweeps
- -
- Run comparison diffing
- ✓
- Model registry bundled
- -
- Data versioning integration
- -
- Distributed multi node tracking
- -
- Team collaboration workspaces
- ✓
- LLM genai eval tracking
- ✓
- RBAC governance
- ✓
- SOC2
- ✓
- Pricing model
- Freemium saas
Platform & deployment
Independently observed- Web
- Cloud / SaaS
Integrations (4)
Independently observed- Azure
- Anthropic
- Cohere
- OpenAI
Guild AI alternatives
Other experiment tracking we track, ranked by the same independent score.
- PolyaxonKubernetes orchestration platform for machine learning and AI workload managementlow · 26%
- Amazon SageMaker ExperimentsA fully managed machine learning platform for building, training, and deploying models at scale with integrated infrastructure and toolslow · 42%
- ValohaiAn MLOps platform for orchestrating machine learning workflows across experimentation, training, and production environmentslow · 22%
- CometAn AI observability platform for debugging, evaluating, and monitoring LLM applications and agent workflowslow · 26%
- DVCLiveA Python logging module for machine learning experiment tracking that integrates with version controllow · 3%
Compare Guild AI
Side by side against other experiment tracking, attribute by attribute, with a source on every value.
The Vioscale score: one lens on the evidence
Not user reviews and not a paid placement: a confidence-weighted blend of the independent signals below (adoption, activity, security posture, and more), which you can sort and re-weight yourself. Vendors can correct their listing but can never move their rank, and stars are weighted low as a vanity metric. It is one way to read the evidence for Guild AI, not the verdict.
| Signal | Score | Weight | Contribution | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security posture | 70 | 0.07 | 5.1 | ✓ |
| Capabilities | 81 | 0.05 | 4.0 | ✓ |
| Integrations | 20 | 0.04 | 0.8 | ✓ |
| Price level | 0 | 0.05 | 0.0 | - |
| Reliability | 0 | 0.07 | 0.0 | - |
| Pricing transparency | 0 | 0.08 | 0.0 | - |
Computed . Re-weight it by intent, or see the full method.
All data & sourcesshow ↓
Every value we hold, with its source, retrieval date, and confidence. This is the evidence behind the score: don't trust it, verify it.
Features
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Capabilities | Soc2: Yes · Open source: No · Pricing model: freemium-saas · Rbac governance: Yes · Deployment model: managed-SaaS · Run comparison diffing: Yes | mediumsource · 2026-08-25 · 60% |
Integrations
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Count | 4 | mediumsource · 2026-08-25 · 60% |
Pricing
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Model | commercial | mediumsource · 2026-08-17 · 60% |