What is Egeria?
A framework that enables different data management tools, platforms, and teams to interoperate by using a common open metadata standard and providing connectors, APIs, and governance capabilities to synchronize and query information across distributed systems.
Egeria pricing
We don't have Egeria's full plan breakdown yet (its pricing page resisted automated reading). Here's what we could confirm. Always check live pricing for exact numbers.
Open source and free
Platform & deployment
Independently observed- CLI
- Web
- On-premise
- Self-hosted
Security & compliance
Known vulnerabilities: 0 (0 in the last 12 months) sourcea count reflects scale & disclosure, not quality
Egeria alternatives
Other data governance we track, ranked by the same independent score.
- SatoriCloud-native platform that automatically discovers, monitors, and controls access to sensitive data across your infrastructurelow · 12%
- Apache Rangerlow · 20%
- OneTrust Data Governance & DiscoveryUnified platform automating governance, privacy, and risk management across enterprise data and AI systemsmedium · 55%
- Varonis Data Security PlatformProtect AI systems and their data through unified security intelligencelow · 26%
- PrivaceraCloud-based data governance and privacy compliance platformlow · 21%
- ImmutaA data provisioning platform that delivers secure, compliant data access at scalelow · 3%
Compare Egeria
Side by side against other data governance, attribute by attribute, with a source on every value.
The Vioscale score: one lens on the evidence
Not user reviews and not a paid placement: a confidence-weighted blend of the independent signals below (adoption, activity, security posture, and more), which you can sort and re-weight yourself. Vendors can correct their listing but can never move their rank, and stars are weighted low as a vanity metric. It is one way to read the evidence for Egeria, not the verdict.
| Signal | Score | Weight | Contribution | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing transparency | 80 | 0.08 | 6.7 | ✓ |
| Development activity | 63 | 0.09 | 5.9 | ✓ |
| Price level | 100 | 0.05 | 5.2 | ✓ |
| Release cadence | 72 | 0.05 | 3.8 | ✓ |
| Security score | 71 | 0.04 | 3.0 | ✓ |
| Dependent projects | 27 | 0.06 | 1.7 | ✓ |
| Stars | 56 | 0.03 | 1.5 | ✓ |
| Reliability | 0 | 0.07 | 0.0 | - |
| Capabilities | 0 | 0.08 | 0.0 | - |
| Integrations | 0 | 0.09 | 0.0 | - |
| Security posture | 0 | 0.07 | 0.0 | - |
| Package downloads | 0 | 0.14 | 0.0 | - |
| Developer Q&A activity | 0 | 0.06 | 0.0 | - |
Computed . Re-weight it by intent, or see the full method.
All data & sourcesshow ↓
Every value we hold, with its source, retrieval date, and confidence. This is the evidence behind the score: don't trust it, verify it.