What is Arkime?
A network monitoring tool that passively captures and analyzes traffic, extracting detailed session information and providing searchable records with flexible retention policies for integration into existing security infrastructure.
Arkime pricing
We don't have Arkime's full plan breakdown yet (its pricing page resisted automated reading). Here's what we could confirm. Always check live pricing for exact numbers.
Platform & deployment
Independently observed- Self-hosted
Integrations (6)
Independently observed- PassiveTotal
- VirusTotal
- Censys
- Shodan
- Slack
- Elasticsearch
Security & compliance
Known vulnerabilities: 0 (0 in the last 12 months) sourcea count reflects scale & disclosure, not quality
Arkime alternatives
Other network security we track, ranked by the same independent score.
- Zeeklow · 24%
- ExtraHop Reveal(x)Real-time network visibility and threat detection for modern security operationslow · 13%
- Snortlow · 25%
- Vectra AIAI-powered threat detection and response platform for enterprise networks and cloud environmentslow · 3%
- IllumioAI-driven security platform that detects cyberattacks and automatically isolates compromised systems to limit breach damage.low · 13%
- CorelightNetwork threat detection and response powered by behavioral analysis and machine learninglow · 15%
Compare Arkime
Side by side against other network security, attribute by attribute, with a source on every value.
The Vioscale score: one lens on the evidence
Not user reviews and not a paid placement: a confidence-weighted blend of the independent signals below (adoption, activity, security posture, and more), which you can sort and re-weight yourself. Vendors can correct their listing but can never move their rank, and stars are weighted low as a vanity metric. It is one way to read the evidence for Arkime, not the verdict.
| Signal | Score | Weight | Contribution | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price level | 100 | 0.05 | 5.2 | ✓ |
| Development activity | 53 | 0.09 | 4.9 | ✓ |
| Release cadence | 87 | 0.05 | 4.5 | ✓ |
| Security score | 67 | 0.04 | 2.8 | ✓ |
| Integrations | 24 | 0.09 | 2.3 | ✓ |
| Pricing transparency | 25 | 0.08 | 2.1 | ✓ |
| Stars | 73 | 0.03 | 1.9 | ✓ |
| Reliability | 0 | 0.07 | 0.0 | - |
| Capabilities | 0 | 0.08 | 0.0 | - |
| Dependent projects | 0 | 0.06 | 0.0 | ✓ |
| Security posture | 0 | 0.07 | 0.0 | - |
| Package downloads | 0 | 0.14 | 0.0 | - |
| Developer Q&A activity | 0 | 0.06 | 0.0 | - |
Computed . Re-weight it by intent, or see the full method.
All data & sourcesshow ↓
Every value we hold, with its source, retrieval date, and confidence. This is the evidence behind the score: don't trust it, verify it.
Activity
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Commits last 30d | 46 | mediumsource · 2026-08-26 · 65% |
Adoption
Integrations
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Count | 6 | mediumsource · 2026-08-19 · 60% |
Language
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Primary | C | highsource · 2026-08-26 · 90% |
License
| Attribute | Value | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Spdx | Apache-2.0 | highsource · 2026-08-26 · 95% |