Comparison

Travis CI vs Woodpecker CI

No leader: the top candidate Travis CI has only 0.19 confidence (low), below the 0.35 needed to declare a winner. The attribute-by-attribute breakdown below, with a source and date on every value, is the honest way to compare them.

Machine formatsJSONMarkdownGraphQLor send Accept: application/json
Travis CI73
Woodpecker CI60
Score
Vioscale score
Travis CI73 / 100low · 19%
Woodpecker CI60 / 100low · 43%
Pricing
Free tier
Travis CI
Woodpecker CI
Model
Travis CIfreemium
Woodpecker CIopen_source
Price level
Travis CIlow
Woodpecker CIfree
Transparent
Travis CI
Woodpecker CI
Integrations
Count
Travis CI11
Woodpecker CI
Adoption
Dependent repos
Travis CI
Woodpecker CI4
Github stars
Travis CI
Woodpecker CI7,753
Activity
Commits last 30d
Travis CI
Woodpecker CI100
Release
Cadence days
Travis CI
Woodpecker CI23
History
Travis CI
Woodpecker CI20 items
License
Spdx
Travis CI
Woodpecker CIApache-2.0
Language
Primary
Travis CI
Woodpecker CIGo
Market
Availability
Woodpecker CI

Capabilities

Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for ci/cd tools. “-” means undocumented, not absent.

Deployment
Hosting
Travis CICloud + self-hosted
Woodpecker CISelf-hosted only
Self-hosted runners
Travis CI
Woodpecker CI
Core
Config-as-code pipelines
Travis CI
Woodpecker CI
Matrix / parallel builds
Travis CI
Woodpecker CI-
Build
Container-native builds
Travis CI
Woodpecker CI
Performance
Build caching
Travis CI
Woodpecker CI-
Security
Secrets management
Travis CI
Woodpecker CI-
Delivery
Deployment environments & approvals
Travis CI
Woodpecker CI-
Ecosystem
Reusable actions / marketplace
Travis CI-
Woodpecker CI

What each one is

The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.

Travis CI

A continuous integration and deployment service that enables developers to automatically run tests, perform quality checks, and deploy code. It emphasizes simple configuration syntax and fast feedback cycles through parallel builds across multiple programming languages and environments.

Independently observed

Woodpecker CI

An open source continuous integration and deployment platform that uses Docker containers to execute pipeline steps on self-hosted distributed agents. It supports multiple workflows, dynamic scaling, and extensibility through a plugin ecosystem.

Independently observed

Pricing

List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.

Travis CI

from $13.75/moSubscriptionFree tier100-day trial

From $13.75/month. Free tier for open-source projects; 100 trial builds for private repositories.

  • Usage Based$13.75/month or $153/year
    • 420,000 Linux build credits per year
    • 80 concurrent jobs
    • Premium VMs available
    • 35,000 credits per month included
    • Unlimited users (billed per user)
  • Unlimited Plan$66+/month or $733/year
    • Unlimited credits for non-premium VMs
    • 1–300 concurrent jobs
    • Unlimited collaborators and repositories
    • Unlimited storage
    • Premium VMs available
  • On-Premise/Private CloudContact sales
    • On-premise or private cloud deployment
    • Perforce and Subversion CI/CD support
    • Premium support options
as of verify ↗

Woodpecker CI

Open sourceFree tier

Free and open source

as of verify ↗

Platform & deployment

Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.

Platforms
Web
Travis CI
Woodpecker CI
Deployment
Cloud / SaaS
Travis CI
Woodpecker CI
Self-hosted
Travis CI
Woodpecker CI
On-premise
Travis CI
Woodpecker CI

Integrations

What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.

Travis CI

11 total
  • GitHub
  • GitLab
  • Bitbucket
  • Docker
  • DeepSource
  • Coveralls
  • Coverity Scan
  • SourceClear
  • HashiCorp Vault
  • Slack
  • NPM
Independently observed

Woodpecker CI

Not documented yet.

Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.