Comparison

StackHawk vs Veracode

No leader: the top candidate Veracode has only 0.11 confidence (low), below the 0.35 needed to declare a winner. The attribute-by-attribute breakdown below, with a source and date on every value, is the honest way to compare them.

Machine formatsJSONMarkdownGraphQLor send Accept: application/json
StackHawk51
Veracode59
Score
Vioscale score
StackHawk51 / 100medium · 73%
Veracode59 / 100low · 11%
Pricing
Free tier
StackHawk
Veracode
Model
StackHawkfreemium
Veracodecommercial
Price level
StackHawklow
Veracode
Transparent
StackHawk
Veracode
Integrations
Count
StackHawk11
Veracode
Security
Disclosure policy
StackHawk
Veracode
Soc2
StackHawk
Veracode
Reliability
Status page
StackHawk
Veracode
Market
Availability
Veracode

Capabilities

Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for devsecops tools. “-” means undocumented, not absent.

Scan types
SAST (static analysis)
StackHawk-
Veracode
DAST (dynamic analysis)
StackHawk
Veracode
SCA / dependency scanning
StackHawk-
Veracode
Secret scanning
StackHawk-
Veracode-
Container / image scanning
StackHawk-
Veracode
IaC misconfiguration scanning
StackHawk-
Veracode-
Governance
OSS licence compliance
StackHawk-
Veracode-
SBOM generation (SPDX/CycloneDX)
StackHawk-
Veracode-
Remediation
Automated fix / upgrade PRs
StackHawk
Veracode
Prioritisation
Reachability / exploitability prioritisation
StackHawk-
Veracode-
Deployment
Hosting
StackHawkCloud only
VeracodeCloud only
Integration
First-class CI / pipeline integration
StackHawk
Veracode-
In-editor / IDE scanning
StackHawk
Veracode-
Licensing
OSS engine available
StackHawk
Veracode-

What each one is

The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.

StackHawk

A platform that enables AI coding agents (such as Claude, GitHub Copilot, Cursor) to automatically identify, analyze, and remediate security vulnerabilities in applications during development, eliminating context switching and manual handoffs to security teams.

Independently observed

Veracode

Veracode provides unified application security posture management with tools for detecting, analyzing, and remediating application vulnerabilities across the software development lifecycle.

Independently observed

Pricing

List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.

StackHawk

from $10/moSubscriptionFree tier14-day trial

From $10/user/month (Wingman). 14-day free trial. Scale plan available via sales consultation.

  • Wingman$10/user/month
    • Works inside Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot
    • Auto-configures and boots app
    • Runtime testing against running app
    • Finds and fixes vulnerabilities in same session
    • Auto-rescanning to verify fix
    • +3 more
  • ScaleContact sales
    • Everything in Wingman
    • Attack surface discovery
    • Sensitive data detection
    • Deeper, broader scan coverage
    • Program reporting (coverage, fix rates by team)
    • +2 more
as of verify ↗

Veracode

Pricing not documented yet.

Platform & deployment

Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.

Platforms
Web
StackHawk
Veracode
CLI
StackHawk
Veracode
Deployment
Cloud / SaaS
StackHawk
Veracode

Integrations

What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.

StackHawk

12 total
  • Claude Code
  • Codex
  • Gemini CLI
  • GitHub Copilot
  • OpenCode
  • Cursor
  • Snyk
  • Auth0
  • GitHub Actions
  • GitLab
  • Jenkins
  • CircleCI
Independently observed

Veracode

Not documented yet.

Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.