Semaphore vs TeamCity
On the evidence we track, Semaphore leads this comparison with a composite score of 63/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for ci/cd tools. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Semaphore
LeaderA delivery platform that combines CI/CD capabilities with AI-driven features through a command-line interface.
TeamCity
TeamCity is a continuous integration and deployment tool that connects to multiple version control providers, offers command-line and programmatic access for pipeline management, and can run on your infrastructure or in the cloud.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Semaphore
LeaderPay-per-minute metered compute: $0.0025/min (self-hosted) to $0.09/min (MacOS). Includes 20 concurrent jobs, $15/month free credits, 9.6 GB cache, and free support. Optional modular support and success services.
- Compute - Ubuntu ARM$0.003–$0.012/min depending on vCPU
- Compute - Ubuntu x64$0.0075–$0.015/min depending on vCPU
- Compute - MacOS$0.09/min
- Compute - Self-Hosted$0.0025/min
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
Semaphore
Leader- Flowdock
TeamCity
- GitHub
- GitLab
- Bitbucket
- Perforce
- Slack
- Qodana
Semaphore or TeamCity: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.