OmniFocus vs Super Productivity
On the evidence we track, Super Productivity leads this comparison with a composite score of 54/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for task management. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
OmniFocus
A task and project management application that enables users to organize actions and projects across multiple devices with features like tagging, scheduling, location-based views, calendar integration, and customizable perspectives.
Super Productivity
LeaderA task management application featuring time tracking, Pomodoro timers, and focus modes. Designed as open-source software that stores all data locally by default with optional cloud sync.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
OmniFocus
- Spark
- Apple Calendar
- Siri
Super Productivity
Leader- GitHub
- GitLab
- Jira
- Google Calendar
- Trello
- Linear
- ClickUp
- OpenProject
- Gitea
- Redmine
- Dropbox
- WebDAV
- CalDAV
- iCal
- Open Project
- Forgejo
- Nextcloud Deck
OmniFocus or Super Productivity: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.