vioscaleAI
Comparison

Mend vs Veracode

On the evidence we track, Veracode leads this comparison with a composite score of 73/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.

Mend full profile →Veracode full profile →
Machine formatsMarkdownJSONGraphQLMarkdown is open. JSON and GraphQL need a free key.
Mend59
★Veracode73
Score
vioscaleAI score
Mend59 / 100medium · 70%
Veracode73 / 100medium · 52%
Pricing
Free tier
Mend✓
Veracode–
Model
Mendfreemium
Veracodecommercial
Price level
Mendlow
Veracode–
Transparent
Mend✗
Veracode–
Integrations
Count
Mend2
Veracode25
Security
Fedramp
Mend–
Veracode✓
Gdpr
Mend✓
Veracode✓
Hipaa
Mend–
Veracode✓
Iso27001
Mend✓
Veracode✓
Pci
Mend–
Veracode✓
Soc2
Mend✓
Veracode✓
Trust center
Reliability
Status page
Mend✓
Veracode✓
Market
Availability
Content
Faq
Mend7 items
Veracode–

Capabilities

Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for devsecops tools. “-” means undocumented, not absent.

Scan types
SAST (static analysis)
Mend✓
Veracode✓
DAST (dynamic analysis)
Mend✓
Veracode✓
SCA / dependency scanning
Mend✓
Veracode✓
Secret scanning
Mend✗
Veracode-
Container / image scanning
Mend✗
Veracode✓
IaC misconfiguration scanning
Mend✗
Veracode✓
Governance
OSS licence compliance
Mend✓
Veracode✓
SBOM generation (SPDX/CycloneDX)
Mend✓
Veracode-
Remediation
Automated fix / upgrade PRs
Mend✓
Veracode✓
Prioritisation
Reachability / exploitability prioritisation
Mend✓
Veracode✓
Deployment
Hosting
MendCloud + self-hosted
VeracodeCloud only
Integration
First-class CI / pipeline integration
Mend✓
Veracode✓
In-editor / IDE scanning
Mend✗
Veracode✓
Licensing
OSS engine available
Mend✓
Veracode-

What each one is

The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.

Mend

An automated security platform that helps identify and manage security risks in application code and external dependencies throughout the development lifecycle.

Independently observed

Veracode

Leader

A comprehensive platform for identifying, prioritizing, and fixing application security vulnerabilities across code, dependencies, containers, and infrastructure. It combines static and dynamic testing with AI-driven remediation to reduce security risk while maintaining developer velocity.

Independently observed

Pricing

List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.

Mend

enterprise_quoteFree tier

Teams and Enterprise editions; free tier for open source. Contact sales for pricing.

  • Teams-
  • EnterpriseContact sales
  • Renovate Cloud OSSFree
as of verify ↗

Veracode

Leader

Pricing not documented yet.

Platform & deployment

Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.

Platforms
Web
Mend✓
Veracode✓
CLI
Mend✗
Veracode✓
Deployment
Cloud / SaaS
Mend✓
Veracode✓
Self-hosted
Mend✓
Veracode✗

Integrations

What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.

In common (1)
  • GitHub

Mend

8 total - 7 not shared
  • Azure DevOps
  • GitHub Marketplace
  • Bitbucket Cloud
  • Jenkins
  • Atlassian Bamboo
  • CI/CD
  • Repository integration
Independently observed

Veracode

Leader
20 total - 19 not shared
  • GitLab
  • AWS
  • Google Cloud
  • Microsoft Defender for Cloud
  • Snyk
  • Checkmarx
  • Contrast Security
  • Fortify OnDemand
  • Rapid7 InsightAppSec
  • Qualys
  • JFrog Xray
  • AWS Config
  • AWS Inspector
  • Prisma Cloud
  • Wiz
  • CrowdStrike
  • Orca
  • SecurityScorecard
  • Terraform Cloud
Independently observed
Still deciding?

Mend or Veracode: which one depends on you

A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.

Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works

Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.