Comparison

idna vs requests

No clear leader: idna (84.2) and requests (80.0) are within the 5-point margin; treat as a tie. The attribute-by-attribute breakdown below, with a source and date on every value, is the honest way to compare them.

Machine formatsJSONMarkdownGraphQLor send Accept: application/json
idna84
requests80
Score
Vioscale score
idna84 / 100low · 40%updating
requests80 / 100low · 41%updating
Pricing
Free tier
idna
requests
Model
Price level
idnafree
requestsfree
Transparent
idna
requests
Adoption
Dependent repos
requests679,836
Github stars
idna291
requests54,248
Package downloads weekly
Activity
Commits last 30d
idna58
requests5
Release
Cadence days
idna14
requests19
History
requests19 items
License
Spdx
Language
Primary
idnaPython
requestsPython
Market
Availability
idna
Content
Faq
requests6 items

What each one is

The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.

idna

A Python package implementing the IDNA specification for handling internationalized domain names in applications. It converts Unicode domain names to ASCII-compatible format and back, with support for Unicode normalization and validation that exceeds the standard library.

Independently observed

requests

An open-source HTTP library for Python that handles HTTP/1.1 requests with automatic connection pooling, cookie management, multiple authentication methods, and comprehensive support for proxies, streaming, and content negotiation.

Independently observed

Pricing

List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.

idna

Open sourceFree tier
as of verify ↗

requests

Open sourceFree tier

Completely free and open source

as of verify ↗

Platform & deployment

Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.

Platforms
CLI
idna
requests

Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.