Fathom vs Grain
On the evidence we track, Grain leads this comparison with a composite score of 77/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for conversation intelligence. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Fathom
A service that records meetings, produces transcripts and summaries with action items, and automatically connects meeting information to CRM and team collaboration platforms.
Grain
LeaderGrain automatically records Zoom meetings and generates AI-powered transcripts with searchable summaries and highlights. The service makes it easy for teams to share recordings and track important discussion points for follow-up.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
- Zoom
- Google Meet
- Microsoft Teams
- Google Calendar
- ChatGPT
- Claude
- Slack
- Salesforce
- HubSpot
Fathom
- Outlook Calendar
- Notion
- Asana
Grain
Leader- Webex
- Aircall
- Zapier
- Productboard
- Gong
- Outlook
Fathom or Grain: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.