Comparison

Agora vs Mailgun

On the evidence we track, Agora leads this comparison with a composite score of 82/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.

Machine formatsJSONMarkdownGraphQLor send Accept: application/json
Agora82
Mailgun59
Score
Vioscale score
Agora82 / 100medium · 72%updating
Mailgun59 / 100medium · 73%updating
Pricing
Free tier
Agora
Mailgun
Model
Agoraquote
Mailguncommercial
Price level
Agoralow
Mailgunlow
Transparent
Agora
Mailgun
Integrations
Count
Agora7
Mailgun2
Security
Disclosure policy
Agora
Mailgun
Gdpr
Agora
Mailgun
Hipaa
Agora
Mailgun
Iso27001
Agora
Mailgun
Soc2
Agora
Mailgun
Reliability
Sla pct
Agora99.999
Mailgun
Status page
Agora
Mailgun

Capabilities

Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for communication apis. “-” means undocumented, not absent.

Channels
SMS
Agora-
Mailgun-
Voice
Agora
Mailgun-
WhatsApp
Agora-
Mailgun-
RCS
Agora-
Mailgun-
Transactional email
Agora-
Mailgun
Video / real-time
Agora
Mailgun-
In-app chat
Agora
Mailgun-
Verify / OTP / 2FA
Agora-
Mailgun-
Messaging
Two-way messaging
Agora
Mailgun-
Reach
Geographic coverage
AgoraGlobal
MailgunGlobal
Delivery
Email deliverability tools
Agora-
Mailgun
Commercial
Published per-unit pricing
Agora
Mailgun

What each one is

The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.

Agora

Leader

A global real-time engagement platform providing APIs and infrastructure for developers to build voice calling, video calling, live streaming, messaging, and conversational AI agent experiences without building the underlying infrastructure.

Independently observed

Mailgun

A developer-focused platform that handles sending transactional emails reliably, with integrated tools for validating email lists, testing inbox placement, monitoring sender reputation, and tracking email performance.

Independently observed

Pricing

List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.

Agora

Leader
Usage-basedFree tier

Usage-based metered pricing ranging from $0.0015/1000 messages to $16.99/1000 minutes. Free tier available for all core products.

  • Conversational AI PlatformFree
    • Voice AI agents
    • Any LLM integration
    • Interruption handling
    • Noise suppression
    • Natural conversation flow
  • RTCFree
    • Video calling
    • Voice calling
    • Live streaming
    • Recording
    • Media transcoding
    • +1 more
  • ChatFree
    • Private messaging
    • Group messaging
    • End-to-end encryption support
    • Message storage
  • SignalingFree
    • Real-time synchronization
    • Low-latency signaling
    • High concurrency support
as of verify ↗

Mailgun

from $0.75/moSubscription30-day trial

From $49/mo. First month free.

  • Pilot$49/mo (first month free), unlimited users
    • First month free
    • Unlimited users
    • 2,500 email address validations
    • 25 inbox placement tests
    • Detailed documentation
    • +1 more
  • Starter$99/mo (first month free), unlimited users
    • First month free
    • Unlimited users
    • 5,000 email address validations
    • 50 inbox placement tests
    • Spam trap monitoring (1 domain)
    • +6 more
  • ContractContact sales
    • Unlimited users
    • Custom domain and IP monitoring
    • Custom email validations
    • Custom inbox placement tests
    • Designated Technical Account Manager
as of verify ↗

Platform & deployment

Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.

Platforms
Web
Agora
Mailgun
CLI
Agora
Mailgun
Deployment
Cloud / SaaS
Agora
Mailgun

Integrations

What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.

Agora

Leader
7 total
  • ActiveFence
  • DeepAR
  • FaceUnity
  • Banuba
  • Palabra
  • DataDog
  • OKTA
Independently observed

Mailgun

2 total
  • Google Postmaster Tools
  • Microsoft SNDS
Independently observed

Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.