Medical Imaging Pacs
Top signal weightsIntegrations 0.16Package downloads 0.14Development activity 0.09Capabilities 0.08
Rank by intent
Ranking basisMost secureSecurity posture 0.19Integrations 0.14Package downloads 0.12Github activity 0.08
Same facts, re-weighted. Only the weighting changes, never the underlying evidence.
| # | Software | Score | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Intelerad Medical SystemsCloud-based medical imaging platform that connects healthcare professionals to improve patient care workflows | 83 | low · 28% |
| 2 | PostDICOMMedical imaging archive and diagnostic viewer hosted securely in the cloud | 56 | medium · 52% |
| 3 | OHIF Viewer | 56 | low · 29% |
| 4 | Horos | 51 | low · 18% |
| 5 | Radiant DICOM ViewerWindows desktop application for viewing and analyzing DICOM medical images with PACS connectivity | 21 | low · 18% |
| 6 | Dedalus IMPAXIntegrated healthcare data platform enabling coordinated care across hospital and community settings | 20 | low · 7% |
| 7 | GE Healthcare Centricity PACS | 10 | low · 20% |
Ranked by the Vioscale composite: independent signals, not user reviews. See the method.
Medical Imaging Pacs compared
Head-to-head on the attributes that matter here, with a source and date on every value.
- Intelerad Medical SystemsvsOHIF Viewer85/57
- Intelerad Medical SystemsvsPostDICOM85/57
- HorosvsIntelerad Medical Systems51/85
- Dedalus IMPAXvsIntelerad Medical Systems20/85
- Intelerad Medical SystemsvsRadiant DICOM Viewer85/18
- OHIF ViewervsPostDICOM57/57
- HorosvsOHIF Viewer51/57
- Dedalus IMPAXvsOHIF Viewer20/57
- OHIF ViewervsRadiant DICOM Viewer57/18
- HorosvsPostDICOM51/57