IOT Security
Top signal weightsIntegrations 0.16Package downloads 0.14Development activity 0.09Capabilities 0.08
Rank by intent
Balanced is the citeable default. The facts never change, only how the signals are weighted.
| # | Software | Score | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OrdrAutomatically discover, classify, and protect all connected devices with AI-driven security enforcement. | 71 | low · 22%updating |
| 2 | Forescout PlatformAutomatically detect and control access for every connected device without requiring software installation on each one | 38 | low · 22%updating |
| 3 | Phosphorus CybersecuritySecurity management system for connected industrial and IoT devices that identifies risks and automates protective measures | 14 | low · 3%updating |
| 4 | ClarotyAI-powered security platform for protecting industrial and critical infrastructure systems | 9 | low · 15%updating |
| 5 | Nozomi NetworksPlatform for discovering and monitoring industrial devices and detecting security threats | 3 | low · 15%updating |
Ranked by the Vioscale composite: independent signals, not user reviews. See the method.
IOT Security compared
Head-to-head on the attributes that matter here, with a source and date on every value.
- Forescout PlatformvsOrdr38/71
- OrdrvsPhosphorus Cybersecurity71/14
- ClarotyvsOrdr9/71
- Nozomi NetworksvsOrdr3/71
- Forescout PlatformvsPhosphorus Cybersecurity38/14
- ClarotyvsForescout Platform9/38
- Forescout PlatformvsNozomi Networks38/3
- ClarotyvsPhosphorus Cybersecurity9/14
- Nozomi NetworksvsPhosphorus Cybersecurity3/14
- ClarotyvsNozomi Networks9/3