Email Testing Dev
Top signal weightsIntegrations 0.16Package downloads 0.14Development activity 0.09Capabilities 0.08
Rank by intent
Balanced is the citeable default. The facts never change, only how the signals are weighted.
| # | Software | Score | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Testmail.appProgrammable email testing service for developers and QA automating end-to-end test verification | 82 | low · 42%updating |
| 2 | Maildev | 64 | low · 24%updating |
| 3 | MailosaurPlatform for testing email and SMS communications end-to-end before production | 61 | medium · 55%updating |
| 4 | Email on AcidEmail testing and validation platform for pre-send campaign quality assurance | 58 | medium · 66%updating |
| 5 | GreenMail | 58 | low · 31%updating |
| 6 | MailSlurpOn-demand email and SMS testing platform for developers | 50 | medium · 54%updating |
| 7 | MailHog | 43 | low · 19%updating |
| 8 | LitmusAI-powered platform for designing, testing, and monitoring email campaigns across multiple clients | 40 | low · 12%updating |
| 9 | Mailpit | 40 | low · 23%updating |
Ranked by the Vioscale composite: independent signals, not user reviews. See the method.
Email Testing Dev compared
Head-to-head on the attributes that matter here, with a source and date on every value.