DDOS Protection
Top signal weightsIntegrations 0.16Package downloads 0.14Development activity 0.09Capabilities 0.08
Rank by intent
Ranking basisMost secureSecurity posture 0.19Integrations 0.14Package downloads 0.12Github activity 0.08
Same facts, re-weighted. Only the weighting changes, never the underlying evidence.
| # | Software | Score | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fastly DDoS ProtectionAutomatic DDoS attack defense deployed instantly | 92 | low · 10% |
| 2 | Verisign DDoS Protection Services | 45 | low · 19% |
| 3 | Cloudflare DDoS ProtectionLarge-scale protection against distributed denial-of-service attacks using global network infrastructure | 43 | low · 42% |
| 4 | Google Cloud ArmorA network security service that defends applications against denial-of-service attacks, bot-based fraud, and web application threats | 38 | low · 16% |
| 5 | AWS ShieldAutomatic network-layer DDoS attack detection and mitigation for cloud applications | 35 | medium · 50% |
| 6 | Netscout Arbor DDoS ProtectionEnterprise-grade DDoS detection and mitigation for critical internet infrastructure | 12 | low · 41% |
Ranked by the Vioscale composite: independent signals, not user reviews. See the method.
DDOS Protection compared
Head-to-head on the attributes that matter here, with a source and date on every value.
- Cloudflare DDoS ProtectionvsFastly DDoS Protection60/92
- Fastly DDoS ProtectionvsVerisign DDoS Protection Services92/45
- Fastly DDoS ProtectionvsGoogle Cloud Armor92/39
- AWS ShieldvsFastly DDoS Protection38/92
- Fastly DDoS ProtectionvsNetscout Arbor DDoS Protection92/9
- Cloudflare DDoS ProtectionvsVerisign DDoS Protection Services60/45
- Cloudflare DDoS ProtectionvsGoogle Cloud Armor60/39
- AWS ShieldvsCloudflare DDoS Protection38/60
- Cloudflare DDoS ProtectionvsNetscout Arbor DDoS Protection60/9
- Google Cloud ArmorvsVerisign DDoS Protection Services39/45