Backend Frameworks
Top signal weightsIntegrations 0.16Package downloads 0.14Development activity 0.09Capabilities 0.08
Rank by intent
Ranking basisMost actively maintainedGithub activity 0.17Integrations 0.14Package downloads 0.12Capabilities 0.07
Same facts, re-weighted. Only the weighting changes, never the underlying evidence.
| # | Software | Score | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Django | 73 | medium · 59% |
| 2 | Express | 72 | medium · 63% |
| 3 | FastAPI | 68 | medium · 66% |
| 4 | Ruby on Rails | 64 | low · 27% |
| 5 | ASP.NET Core | 63 | low · 35% |
| 6 | Spring Boot | 62 | low · 23% |
| 7 | Fastify | 60 | low · 44% |
| 8 | NestJS | 60 | low · 44% |
| 9 | Symfony | 60 | low · 36% |
| 10 | Flask | 58 | low · 35% |
| 11 | Phoenix | 55 | low · 43% |
| 12 | Laravel | 54 | medium · 55% |
| 13 | Axum | 46 | low · 27% |
| 14 | Gin | 43 | low · 35% |
Ranked by the Vioscale composite: independent signals, not user reviews. See the method.
Backend Frameworks compared
Head-to-head on the attributes that matter here, with a source and date on every value.