Attack Surface Management
Top signal weightsIntegrations 0.16Package downloads 0.14Development activity 0.09Capabilities 0.08
Rank by intent
Balanced is the citeable default. The facts never change, only how the signals are weighted.
| # | Software | Score | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NucleiAutomated security testing platform that continuously scans applications, APIs, code, and infrastructure using AI to identify vulnerabilities | 65 | low · 26%updating |
| 2 | DetectifyExternal attack surface management platform combining continuous automated scanning with real-world hacker research | 61 | medium · 56%updating |
| 3 | Amass | 39 | low · 17%updating |
| 4 | Microsoft Defender EASMIdentify and understand security gaps in web-facing resources | 33 | low · 22%updating |
| 5 | CyCognitoContinuous exposure management platform that identifies and validates vulnerabilities in your external attack surface | 9 | low · 3%updating |
| 6 | Tenable Attack Surface ManagementContinuously discover and monitor internet-facing assets to understand and reduce external security exposure | 3 | low · 15%updating |
Ranked by the Vioscale composite: independent signals, not user reviews. See the method.
Attack Surface Management compared
Head-to-head on the attributes that matter here, with a source and date on every value.
- DetectifyvsNuclei61/65
- AmassvsNuclei39/65
- Microsoft Defender EASMvsNuclei33/65
- CyCognitovsNuclei9/65
- NucleivsTenable Attack Surface Management65/3
- AmassvsDetectify39/61
- DetectifyvsMicrosoft Defender EASM61/33
- CyCognitovsDetectify9/61
- DetectifyvsTenable Attack Surface Management61/3
- AmassvsMicrosoft Defender EASM39/33