AI Evals Testing
Top signal weightsIntegrations 0.16Package downloads 0.14Development activity 0.09Capabilities 0.08
Rank by intent
Balanced is the citeable default. The facts never change, only how the signals are weighted.
| # | Software | Score | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Patronus AIAutomated evaluation and monitoring platform for testing and optimizing language models and AI agents | 69 | low · 37%updating |
| 2 | Helm | 65 | low · 29%updating |
| 3 | Ragas | 58 | low · 27%updating |
| 4 | PromptfooAutomated testing platform that uses red teaming to identify and fix security vulnerabilities in AI applications before deployment | 54 | medium · 55%updating |
| 5 | LM Evaluation Harness | 54 | low · 40%updating |
| 6 | TruLens | 49 | low · 32%updating |
| 7 | OpenAI Evals | 45 | low · 30%updating |
| 8 | GalileoAI evaluation and observability platform for testing, monitoring, and improving AI systems | 45 | low · 8%updating |
Ranked by the Vioscale composite: independent signals, not user reviews. See the method.
AI Evals Testing compared
Head-to-head on the attributes that matter here, with a source and date on every value.