TeamCity vs Travis CI
No leader: the top candidate Travis CI has only 0.19 confidence (low), below the 0.35 needed to declare a winner. The attribute-by-attribute breakdown below, with a source and date on every value, is the honest way to compare them.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for ci/cd tools. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
TeamCity
Not documented yet.
Travis CI
A continuous integration and deployment service that enables developers to automatically run tests, perform quality checks, and deploy code. It emphasizes simple configuration syntax and fast feedback cycles through parallel builds across multiple programming languages and environments.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
TeamCity
Pricing not documented yet.
Travis CI
From $13.75/month. Free tier for open-source projects; 100 trial builds for private repositories.
- Usage Based$13.75/month or $153/year
- 420,000 Linux build credits per year
- 80 concurrent jobs
- Premium VMs available
- 35,000 credits per month included
- Unlimited users (billed per user)
- Unlimited Plan$66+/month or $733/year
- Unlimited credits for non-premium VMs
- 1–300 concurrent jobs
- Unlimited collaborators and repositories
- Unlimited storage
- Premium VMs available
- On-Premise/Private CloudContact sales
- On-premise or private cloud deployment
- Perforce and Subversion CI/CD support
- Premium support options
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
TeamCity
Not documented yet.
Travis CI
- GitHub
- GitLab
- Bitbucket
- Docker
- DeepSource
- Coveralls
- Coverity Scan
- SourceClear
- HashiCorp Vault
- Slack
- NPM
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.