Comparison

StyleLint vs Trunk

On the evidence we track, StyleLint leads this comparison with a composite score of 79/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.

StyleLint full profile →Trunk full profile →

Machine formatsJSON Markdown GraphQLor send Accept: application/json

★StyleLint79

Trunk59

Attribute comparison across 2 tools
Attribute	StyleLintLeader	Trunk
Vioscale score	79 / 100medium · 71%	59 / 100medium · 74%
Pricing
Free tierpricing.free_tier	✓	✓
Modelpricing.model	open_source	freemium
Price levelpricing.price_level	free	free
Transparentpricing.transparent	✓	✓
Integrations
Countintegrations.count	-	7
Security
Scorecardsecurity.scorecard	7.5	-
Soc2security.soc2	-	✓
Vulnerabilitiessecurity.vulnerabilities	Count: 1 · Source: https://advisories.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/advisories?ecosystem=npm&package_name=stylelint&per_page=100 · Last 12m: 0 · Max severity: LOW	-
Reliability
Status pagereliability.status_page	-	✓
Adoption
Dependent reposadoption.dependent_repos	200,392	-
Github starsadoption.github_stars	11,513	-
Package downloads weeklyadoption.package_downloads_weekly	11,124,156	-
Activity
Commits last 30dactivity.commits_last_30d	31	-
Release
Cadence daysrelease.cadence_days	7	-
Historyrelease.history	20 items	-
License
Spdxlicense.spdx	MIT	-
Language
Primarylanguage.primary	JavaScript	-
Market
Availabilitymarket.availability	-	Available worldwide · Popular in US · HQ US

Score

Vioscale score

StyleLint79 / 100medium · 71%

Trunk59 / 100medium · 74%

Pricing

Free tier

StyleLint✓

Trunk✓

Model

StyleLintopen_source

Trunkfreemium

Price level

StyleLintfree

Trunkfree

Transparent

StyleLint✓

Trunk✓

Integrations

Count

StyleLint–

Trunk7

Security

Scorecard

StyleLint7.5

Trunk–

Soc2

StyleLint–

Trunk✓

Vulnerabilities

StyleLintCount: 1 · Source: https://advisories.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/advisories?ecosystem=npm&package_name=stylelint&per_page=100 · Last 12m: 0 · Max severity: LOW

Trunk–

Reliability

Status page

StyleLint–

Trunk✓

Adoption

Dependent repos

StyleLint200,392

Trunk–

Github stars

StyleLint11,513

Trunk–

Package downloads weekly

StyleLint11,124,156

Trunk–

Activity

Commits last 30d

StyleLint31

Trunk–

Release

Cadence days

StyleLint7

Trunk–

History

StyleLint20 items

Trunk–

License

Spdx

StyleLintMIT

Trunk–

Language

Primary

StyleLintJavaScript

Trunk–

Market

Availability

StyleLint–

TrunkAvailable worldwide · Popular in US · HQ US

Capabilities

Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for code quality tools. “-” means undocumented, not absent.

Capability comparison for Code Quality Tools
Capability	StyleLint	Trunk
Core
Function	Linter + formatter	-
Language scope	Single-language	-
Implementation language	JavaScript	-
Capability
Autofix	✓	✓
Config
Config model	Config file	-
Extensibility
Custom rules	✓	-
Deployment
Deployment	CLI-local	-
Delivery
Editor integration	✓	-
CI / VCS gating	✓	✓
Insight
Code metrics	✓	-
Performance
Incremental / monorepo aware	✓	-
Licensing
Open-source	OSS	Closed
Commercial
Pricing model	Free	Per-contributor

Core

Function

StyleLintLinter + formatter

Trunk-

Language scope

StyleLintSingle-language

Trunk-

Implementation language

StyleLintJavaScript

Trunk-

Capability

Autofix

StyleLint✓

Trunk✓

Config

Config model

StyleLintConfig file

Trunk-

Extensibility

Custom rules

StyleLint✓

Trunk-

Deployment

StyleLintCLI-local

Trunk-

Delivery

Editor integration

StyleLint✓

Trunk-

CI / VCS gating

StyleLint✓

Trunk✓

Insight

Code metrics

StyleLint✓

Trunk-

Performance

Incremental / monorepo aware

StyleLint✓

Trunk-

Licensing

Open-source

StyleLintOSS

TrunkClosed

Commercial

Pricing model

StyleLintFree

TrunkPer-contributor

What each one is

The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.

StyleLint

Leader

Stylelint is an open-source CSS linter with over 100 built-in rules that helps developers catch errors, enforce conventions, and automatically fix issues. It supports plugins for custom rules and can parse CSS-like languages such as SCSS and Sass.

Independently observed

Trunk

A platform that identifies unstable tests, automatically isolates them from blocking merges, and provides intelligent merge queue management to reduce build delays and developer friction.

Independently observed

Pricing

List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.

StyleLint

Leader

Open source

Free and open source (MIT License)

as of 2026-08-14verify ↗

Trunk

from $0/moSubscriptionFree tier

Free tier available. Team and Enterprise plans available with volume-based discounts on test spans.

FreeFree
- Flaky test detection and quarantining
- PR comments with test summaries
- GitHub integration
- Slack notifications
- CLI and VS Code usage
- +3 more
Team$0/committer/month
- Everything in Free, plus:
- Unlimited committers
- Volume discounts on test spans
- Merge queue with anti-flake protection
- Intelligent PR batching (up to 100 PRs)
- +6 more
EnterpriseContact sales
- Everything in Team, plus:
- Single Sign-On (SSO) with custom providers
- SAML support
- On-premise deployment
- Advanced admin and authentication controls
- +6 more

as of 2026-08-14verify ↗

Platform & deployment

Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.

Platform and deployment support comparison
Supports	StyleLint	Trunk
WebPlatforms	✗	✓
CLIPlatforms	✓	✓
Cloud / SaaSDeployment	✗	✓
Self-hostedDeployment	✓	✓
On-premiseDeployment	✗	✓

Platforms

Web

StyleLint✗

Trunk✓

CLI

StyleLint✓

Trunk✓

Deployment

Cloud / SaaS

StyleLint✗

Trunk✓

Self-hosted

StyleLint✓

Trunk✓

On-premise

StyleLint✗

Trunk✓

Integrations

What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.

StyleLint

Leader

Not documented yet.

Trunk

9 total

GitHub
Slack
Linear
Jira
Google (OAuth/SSO)
Microsoft (OAuth/SSO)
Jenkins
CircleCI
Travis CI

Independently observed

Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.