StatusCake vs Uptime Kuma
No clear leader: Uptime Kuma (49.9) and StatusCake (47.2) are within the 5-point margin; treat as a tie. The attribute-by-attribute breakdown below, with a source and date on every value, is the honest way to compare them.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for api monitoring. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
StatusCake
An uptime and website monitoring service that tracks application availability and creates alerts across multiple regions.
Uptime Kuma
A self-hosted monitoring solution that tracks the availability of websites and services across multiple protocols and endpoints, with flexible alerting through numerous notification channels.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
StatusCake
Pricing not documented yet.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
StatusCake
- Kubernetes
- Terraform
- Ansible
- Autotask
- Azure
- UptimeRobot
- Pingdom
- HealthChecks.io
Uptime Kuma
- Slack
- Telegram
- Discord
- Gotify
- Pushover
StatusCake or Uptime Kuma: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.