Comparison

StatusCake vs Uptime Kuma

On the evidence we track, Uptime Kuma leads this comparison with a composite score of 57/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.

StatusCake full profile →Uptime Kuma full profile →

Machine formatsJSON Markdown GraphQLor send Accept: application/json

StatusCake20

★Uptime Kuma57

Attribute comparison across 2 tools
Attribute	StatusCake	Uptime KumaLeader
Vioscale score	20 / 100low · 3%	57 / 100low · 40%
Pricing
Free tierpricing.free_tier	-	✓
Modelpricing.model	commercial	open_source
Price levelpricing.price_level	-	free
Integrations
Countintegrations.count	4	-
Security
Vulnerabilitiessecurity.vulnerabilities	-	Count: 0 · Source: https://advisories.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/advisories?ecosystem=go&package_name=github.com%2Flouislam%2Fuptime-kuma&per_page=100 · Last 12m: 0
Adoption
Dependent reposadoption.dependent_repos	-	2
Github starsadoption.github_stars	-	90,643
Activity
Commits last 30dactivity.commits_last_30d	-	64
Release
Cadence daysrelease.cadence_days	-	8
Historyrelease.history	-	20 items
License
Spdxlicense.spdx	-	MIT
Language
Primarylanguage.primary	-	JavaScript

Score

Vioscale score

StatusCake20 / 100low · 3%

Uptime Kuma57 / 100low · 40%

Pricing

Free tier

StatusCake–

Uptime Kuma✓

Model

StatusCakecommercial

Uptime Kumaopen_source

Price level

StatusCake–

Uptime Kumafree

Integrations

Count

StatusCake4

Uptime Kuma–

Security

Vulnerabilities

StatusCake–

Uptime KumaCount: 0 · Source: https://advisories.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/advisories?ecosystem=go&package_name=github.com%2Flouislam%2Fuptime-kuma&per_page=100 · Last 12m: 0

Adoption

Dependent repos

StatusCake–

Uptime Kuma2

Github stars

StatusCake–

Uptime Kuma90,643

Activity

Commits last 30d

StatusCake–

Uptime Kuma64

Release

Cadence days

StatusCake–

Uptime Kuma8

History

StatusCake–

Uptime Kuma20 items

License

Spdx

StatusCake–

Uptime KumaMIT

Language

Primary

StatusCake–

Uptime KumaJavaScript

Capabilities

Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for api monitoring. “-” means undocumented, not absent.

Capability comparison for API Monitoring
Capability	StatusCake	Uptime Kuma
Capabilities
Multi region probes	-	-
Private location agent	-	-
Status page hosting	-	-
Json schema assertions	-	-
Monitoring as code	-	-
Multistep API flows	-	-
Heartbeat deadmans switch	-	-
Self hostable	-	-

Capabilities

Multi region probes

StatusCake-

Uptime Kuma-

Private location agent

StatusCake-

Uptime Kuma-

Status page hosting

StatusCake-

Uptime Kuma-

Json schema assertions

StatusCake-

Uptime Kuma-

Monitoring as code

StatusCake-

Uptime Kuma-

Multistep API flows

StatusCake-

Uptime Kuma-

Heartbeat deadmans switch

StatusCake-

Uptime Kuma-

Self hostable

StatusCake-

Uptime Kuma-

What each one is

The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.

StatusCake

Not documented yet.

Uptime Kuma

Leader

An open-source application for monitoring website uptime and checking service health. Designed to be deployed on your own infrastructure via Docker or traditional server setups.

Independently observed

Pricing

List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.

StatusCake

Pricing not documented yet.

Uptime Kuma

Leader

Open sourceFree tier

as of 2026-08-18verify ↗

Platform & deployment

Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.

Platform and deployment support comparison
Supports	StatusCake	Uptime Kuma
Self-hostedDeployment	-	✓

Deployment

Self-hosted

StatusCake–

Uptime Kuma✓

Integrations

What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.

StatusCake

4 total

Kubernetes
Terraform
Ansible
Autotask

Independently observed

Uptime Kuma

Leader

Not documented yet.

Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.