vioscale
Comparison

Soundtrap vs Steinberg Cubase

On the evidence we track, Soundtrap leads this comparison with a composite score of 71/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.

Soundtrap full profile →Steinberg Cubase full profile →
Machine formatsJSONMarkdownGraphQLor send Accept: application/json
★Soundtrap71
Steinberg Cubase41
Score
Vioscale score
Soundtrap71 / 100low · 36%
Steinberg Cubase41 / 100low · 8%
Pricing
Free tier
Soundtrap✓
Steinberg Cubase–
Model
Soundtrapfreemium
Steinberg Cubase–
Price level
Soundtraplow
Steinberg Cubase–
Starting price
Soundtrap£6.58
Steinberg Cubase–
Transparent
Soundtrap✓
Steinberg Cubase–
Integrations
Count
Soundtrap8
Steinberg Cubase1
Security
Certifications
SoundtrapCOPPA Compliant
Steinberg Cubase–
Gdpr
Soundtrap✓
Steinberg Cubase–
Trust center
Market
Availability

Capabilities

Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for music production daw. “-” means undocumented, not absent.

Capabilities
Architecture model
SoundtrapBrowser cloud client
Steinberg Cubase-
Workflow paradigm
Soundtrap-
Steinberg Cubase-
Vst3 and audio unit au hosting support
Soundtrap-
Steinberg Cubase-
Native pitch correction and vocal tuning flex pitch
Soundtrap✓
Steinberg Cubase✓
Advanced audio warping and time stretching algorithms
Soundtrap-
Steinberg Cubase✓
Midi comping and take folder management
Soundtrap-
Steinberg Cubase-
Sheet music score editor view
Soundtrap-
Steinberg Cubase✓
Hardware control surface deep integration midi learn
Soundtrap-
Steinberg Cubase-
Video playback track for film scoring
Soundtrap✓
Steinberg Cubase-
Surround sound and dolby atmos native mixing
Soundtrap-
Steinberg Cubase✓
SOC2 type ii
Soundtrap-
Steinberg Cubase-
Gpl or permissive oss license
Soundtrap-
Steinberg Cubase-
Pricing model
Soundtrap-
Steinberg Cubase-

What each one is

The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.

Soundtrap

Leader

A cloud-based digital audio workstation for music creation with recording, audio and MIDI editing, mixing, and real-time collaboration capabilities. Provides educational versions tailored for classroom and school use with administrative tools and LMS integrations.

Independently observed

Steinberg Cubase

A comprehensive music production platform that enables recording, mixing, and editing with advanced MIDI tools, audio processing, and professional mixing workflows suited for composers and producers across all skill levels.

Independently observed

Pricing

List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.

Soundtrap

Leader
from £6.58/seat/yrSubscriptionFree tier

From £6.58/seat/year. Free tier available.

  • Classroom£6.58/seat/year
    • Music Production features
    • Video scoring
    • Google Classroom import
    • Assignments
    • 7,410+ loops
    • +5 more
  • School£8.18/seat/year
    • All Music Production features
    • All Podcasting features
    • Unlimited groups
    • Rostering with Google Directory, Canvas, Schoology
    • 9,770+ loops
    • +8 more
  • DistrictContact sales
    • Full HD video scoring
    • All educational features
    • Advanced rostering (Google Directory, Canvas, Schoology, Clever, Classlink, Skolon)
    • Dedicated Account Manager
    • Setup support
    • +1 more
as of verify ↗

Steinberg Cubase

Pricing not documented yet.

Platform & deployment

Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.

Platforms
Web
Soundtrap✓
Steinberg Cubase–
Deployment
Cloud / SaaS
Soundtrap✓
Steinberg Cubase–

Integrations

What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.

Soundtrap

Leader
8 total
  • Google Classroom
  • Canvas
  • Schoology
  • Google Directory
  • Microsoft
  • Clever
  • Classlink
  • Skolon
Independently observed

Steinberg Cubase

1 total
  • Yamaha CL/QL-Series
Independently observed

Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.