Comparison

SonarQube vs Trivy

On the evidence we track, SonarQube leads this comparison with a composite score of 71/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.

Machine formatsJSONMarkdownGraphQLor send Accept: application/json
SonarQube71
Trivy61
Score
Vioscale score
SonarQube71 / 100high · 75%
Trivy61 / 100low · 42%
Pricing
Free tier
SonarQube
Trivy
Model
SonarQubefreemium
Price level
SonarQubemid
Trivyfree
Transparent
SonarQube
Trivy
Integrations
Count
SonarQube20
Trivy7
Reliability
Sla pct
SonarQube99.9
Trivy
Status page
SonarQube
Trivy
Adoption
Dependent repos
SonarQube497
Trivy134
Github stars
SonarQube10,928
Trivy37,628
Activity
Commits last 30d
SonarQube100
Trivy43
Release
Cadence days
SonarQube28
Trivy5
History
SonarQube20 items
License
Spdx
SonarQubeLGPL-3.0
Language
Primary
SonarQubeJava
TrivyGo

Capabilities

Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for devsecops tools. “-” means undocumented, not absent.

Scan types
SAST (static analysis)
SonarQube
Trivy
DAST (dynamic analysis)
SonarQube
Trivy-
SCA / dependency scanning
SonarQube
Trivy
Secret scanning
SonarQube
Trivy
Container / image scanning
SonarQube
Trivy
IaC misconfiguration scanning
SonarQube
Trivy
Governance
OSS licence compliance
SonarQube
Trivy
SBOM generation (SPDX/CycloneDX)
SonarQube
Trivy-
Remediation
Automated fix / upgrade PRs
SonarQube
Trivy-
Prioritisation
Reachability / exploitability prioritisation
SonarQube
Trivy-
Deployment
Hosting
SonarQubeCloud + self-hosted
TrivySelf-hosted only
Integration
First-class CI / pipeline integration
SonarQube
Trivy
In-editor / IDE scanning
SonarQube
Trivy-
Licensing
OSS engine available
SonarQube
Trivy

What each one is

The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.

SonarQube

Leader

A code verification system that scans source code repositories for bugs, security flaws, and quality problems, supporting both human-written and AI-generated code. It integrates directly into development workflows and CI/CD pipelines to provide real-time feedback and automated fix suggestions.

Independently observed

Trivy

A free, open-source tool that scans code repositories, container images, binary artifacts, and Kubernetes clusters to identify vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, secrets, and license compliance issues. Designed for cloud-native environments and integrates into CI/CD pipelines.

Independently observed

Pricing

List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.

SonarQube

Leader
from $34/moSubscriptionFree tier14-day trial

From $34/month. Free tier for open source projects. 14-day free trial.

  • Team$34/month
    • 30+ languages
    • code quality standards
    • bug and vulnerability detection
    • secret scanning
    • AI-powered code fixes
    • +2 more
  • EnterpriseContact sales
    • 40+ languages including ABAP, COBOL, Apex
    • all Team features plus
    • advanced security reports and audit logs
    • OWASP, CWE, PCI DSS, MISRA C++:2023 compliance
    • unlimited users and projects
    • +5 more
as of verify ↗

Trivy

Open sourceFree tier
as of verify ↗

Platform & deployment

Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.

Platforms
Web
SonarQube
Trivy
CLI
SonarQube
Trivy
Deployment
Cloud / SaaS
SonarQube
Trivy
Self-hosted
SonarQube
Trivy
On-premise
SonarQube
Trivy
Air-gapped
SonarQube
Trivy

Integrations

What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.

In common (2)
  • GitHub
  • GitLab

SonarQube

Leader
19 total - 17 not shared
  • Bitbucket
  • Azure DevOps
  • CodeCatalyst
  • CircleCI
  • TravisCI
  • GitHub Actions
  • Jenkins
  • Codemagic
  • Slack
  • Jira
  • Linear
  • GitHub Advanced Security
  • Backstage
  • Compass
  • Cortex
  • Harness
  • Port
Independently observed

Trivy

7 total - 5 not shared
  • Docker
  • Azure Container Registry
  • Kubernetes
  • Harbor
  • CloudNativePG
Independently observed

Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.