Shlink vs T2M
No clear leader: Shlink (41.6) and T2M (41.2) are within the 5-point margin; treat as a tie. The attribute-by-attribute breakdown below, with a source and date on every value, is the honest way to compare them.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for url shorteners. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Shlink
A PHP application that creates shortened URLs hosted on your own infrastructure, with both command-line and REST API interfaces for managing links.
T2M
An all-in-one link management solution providing URL shortening, QR code generation, advanced analytics, geo-targeting, and API access for marketing teams.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
Shlink
- Mercure
- Matomo
- bit.ly
- YOURLS
- RabbitMQ
T2M
- Zapier
- Stripe
- PayPal
- Google Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Google Ads
- Facebook Ads
Shlink or T2M: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.