Comparison

QuestDB vs TimescaleDB

On the evidence we track, TimescaleDB leads this comparison with a composite score of 57/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.

Machine formatsMarkdownJSONGraphQLMarkdown is open. JSON and GraphQL need a free key.
QuestDB50
★TimescaleDB57
Score
vioscaleAI score
QuestDB50 / 100medium · 70%
TimescaleDB57 / 100medium · 62%
Pricing
Free tier
QuestDB✓
TimescaleDB✓
Model
QuestDBfreemium
TimescaleDBfreemium
Price level
QuestDBlow
TimescaleDBmid
Starting price
QuestDB–
TimescaleDB$30
Transparent
QuestDB✗
TimescaleDB✓
Integrations
Count
QuestDB7
TimescaleDB3
Security
Certifications
QuestDB–
TimescaleDBSOC 2 Type II
Disclosure policy
QuestDB–
TimescaleDB✓
Gdpr
QuestDB✓
TimescaleDB✓
Hipaa
QuestDB–
TimescaleDB✓
Pci
QuestDB–
TimescaleDB✓
Scorecard
QuestDB4.4
TimescaleDB4.6
Soc2
QuestDB✓
TimescaleDB✓
Trust center
Reliability
Sla pct
QuestDB99.9
TimescaleDB–
Status page
QuestDB–
TimescaleDB✓
Adoption
Dependent repos
QuestDB106
TimescaleDB0
Github stars
QuestDB17,444
TimescaleDB23,634
Activity
Commits last 30d
QuestDB38
TimescaleDB100
Release
Cadence days
QuestDB16
TimescaleDB12
History
QuestDB20 items
TimescaleDB20 items
License
Spdx
QuestDBApache-2.0
TimescaleDB–
Language
Primary
QuestDBJava
TimescaleDBC
Content
Faq
QuestDB8 items
TimescaleDB7 items

Capabilities

Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for time-series databases. “-” means undocumented, not absent.

Query
Query language (SQL / PromQL / InfluxQL-Flux / Graphite)
QuestDBSQL with time-series extensions (SAMPLE BY, ASOF, HORIZON JOIN, N-dimensional ar
TimescaleDBSQL
SQL compatibility
QuestDBFull SQL
TimescaleDBFull SQL
Ingest
Ingest model
QuestDBPush
TimescaleDBBoth
Model
Data model
QuestDBWide events
TimescaleDBMetrics (labels/tags)
Lifecycle
Downsampling / rollups
QuestDBContinuous aggregates
TimescaleDBContinuous aggregates
Retention / TTL
QuestDBAutomatic
TimescaleDBAutomatic
Storage
Compression (columnar / delta / Gorilla)
QuestDBcolumnar with frame compression
TimescaleDBRow-columnar with compression
Performance
High-cardinality handling
QuestDBStrong
TimescaleDBStrong
Scale
Clustering / horizontal scale
QuestDBDistributed / sharded
TimescaleDBDistributed / sharded
Replication / HA
QuestDB✓
TimescaleDB✓
Deployment
Deployment
QuestDBSelf-hosted
TimescaleDBEmbedded
Interop
Prometheus remote-write compatible
QuestDB-
TimescaleDB-
Licensing
Licence class
QuestDBPermissive OSS
TimescaleDBPermissive OSS

What each one is

The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.

QuestDB

A specialized database engineered to ingest high-volume time-series data at speed, execute queries with minimal latency, and maintain queryable history across tiered storage layers—combining standard SQL with open file formats for portability.

Independently observed

TimescaleDB

Leader

A PostgreSQL-based time-series database optimized to efficiently ingest and store massive volumes of continuously-generated sensor and machine data, with automatic data partitioning, columnar storage compression, and tiered storage for cost-effective long-term retention.

Independently observed

Pricing

List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.

QuestDB

HybridFree tier

Open-source Apache 2.0 free tier; QuestDB Cloud and Enterprise plans available via contact/quote

as of verify ↗

TimescaleDB

Leader
from $30/moUsage-basedFree tier30-day trial

From $30/month minimum compute. Storage from $0.177–$0.212/GB-month. 30-day free trial.

  • Performance$30/month minimum compute; $0.177/GB-month storage
    • 4 database services
    • Up to 16 TB disk storage per service
    • Single-node high-availability replicas
    • Performance Insights
    • Basic support (business hours)
  • Scale$36/month minimum compute; $0.212/GB-month storage
    • Unlimited tiered storage
    • Multi-node high-availability replicas
    • Integrations with observability tools
    • SAML single-sign-on
    • HIPAA compliance
as of verify ↗

Platform & deployment

Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.

Platforms
Web
QuestDB✓
TimescaleDB✓
macOS
QuestDB✓
TimescaleDB✗
Windows
QuestDB✓
TimescaleDB✗
Linux
QuestDB✓
TimescaleDB✗
CLI
QuestDB✓
TimescaleDB✓
Deployment
Cloud / SaaS
QuestDB✓
TimescaleDB✓
Self-hosted
QuestDB✓
TimescaleDB✓
Hybrid
QuestDB✓
TimescaleDB✗

Integrations

What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.

In common (4)
  • Iceberg
  • Kafka
  • AWS
  • Azure

QuestDB

19 total - 15 not shared
  • PostgreSQL
  • Parquet
  • Arrow
  • Polars
  • Pandas
  • Debezium
  • MySQL
  • MongoDB
  • Cassandra
  • Apache Parquet
  • Apache Arrow
  • Claude Code
  • REST API
  • Apache Iceberg
  • Databricks
Independently observed

TimescaleDB

Leader
9 total - 5 not shared
  • S3
  • Observability tools
  • Postgres ecosystem
  • Tableau
  • Power BI
Independently observed
Still deciding?

QuestDB or TimescaleDB: which one depends on you

A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.

Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works

Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.