Comparison

Qlty vs RuboCop

On the evidence we track, RuboCop leads this comparison with a composite score of 70/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.

Machine formatsJSONMarkdownGraphQLor send Accept: application/json
Qlty52
RuboCop70
Score
Vioscale score
Qlty52 / 100medium · 54%updating
RuboCop70 / 100medium · 53%updating
Pricing
Free tier
Qlty
RuboCop
Model
Price level
Qltymid
RuboCopfree
Transparent
Qlty
RuboCop
Integrations
Count
Qlty6
RuboCop14
Reliability
Status page
Qlty
RuboCop
Adoption
Dependent repos
Qlty0
RuboCop115,529
Github stars
Qlty3,130
RuboCop12,899
Activity
Commits last 30d
Qlty9
RuboCop100
Release
Cadence days
Qlty4
RuboCop16
History
RuboCop20 items
License
Spdx
Qlty
RuboCopMIT
Language
Primary
QltyRust
RuboCopRuby
Market
Availability

Capabilities

Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for code quality tools. “-” means undocumented, not absent.

Core
Function
QltyQuality platform
RuboCopLinter + formatter
Language scope
QltyMulti-language
RuboCopSingle-language
Implementation language
QltyRust
RuboCopRuby
Capability
Autofix
Qlty
RuboCop
Config
Config model
QltyConfig file
RuboCopConfig file
Extensibility
Custom rules
Qlty
RuboCop
Deployment
Deployment
QltyBoth
RuboCopCLI-local
Delivery
Editor integration
Qlty
RuboCop
CI / VCS gating
Qlty
RuboCop-
Insight
Code metrics
Qlty
RuboCop-
Performance
Incremental / monorepo aware
Qlty
RuboCop-
Licensing
Open-source
QltyOpen-core
RuboCopOSS
Commercial
Pricing model
QltyPer-contributor
RuboCopFree

What each one is

The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.

Qlty

A code quality platform that automatically analyzes pull requests for linting, formatting, security issues, and code coverage with AI-generated fixes. Supports 40+ languages and integrates with GitHub, IDEs, and CI systems.

Independently observed

RuboCop

Leader

RuboCop is an open-source Ruby linter and formatter that enforces code style based on the Ruby community style guide. It detects code quality issues and can automatically fix many of them, with extensive configuration options and extensibility through community plugins.

Independently observed

Pricing

List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.

Qlty

from $20/moSubscriptionFree tier

Free plan available. Pro from $20/contributor/month. Enterprise from $30/contributor/month. Annual plans include 2 months free.

  • FreeFree
    • Unlimited public and private repositories
    • Unlimited contributors
    • 1,000 analysis minutes per month
    • 100 AI autofixes per month
    • Linting and auto-formatting
    • +8 more
  • Pro$20/contributor/month. Annual billing includes 2 months free.
    • Everything in Free, plus:
    • Shared configurations
    • Trends and hotspots
    • 1 year of history
    • Accelerated analysis
    • +6 more
  • EnterpriseContact sales
    • Everything in Pro, plus:
    • Advanced analytics
    • Organization policies
    • Custom permissions
    • Audit logs
    • +9 more
as of verify ↗

RuboCop

Leader
Open sourceFree tier

Free and open source

as of verify ↗

Platform & deployment

Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.

Platforms
Web
Qlty
RuboCop
macOS
Qlty
RuboCop
Windows
Qlty
RuboCop
Linux
Qlty
RuboCop
CLI
Qlty
RuboCop
Deployment
Cloud / SaaS
Qlty
RuboCop

Integrations

What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.

Qlty

6 total
  • GitHub
  • Visual Studio Code
  • GitHub Actions
  • CircleCI
  • Chrome
  • Firefox
Independently observed

RuboCop

Leader
14 total
  • rubocop-performance
  • rubocop-rails
  • rubocop-rspec
  • rubocop-minitest
  • rubocop-rake
  • rubocop-sequel
  • rubocop-thread_safety
  • rubocop-capybara
  • rubocop-factory_bot
  • rubocop-rspec_rails
  • rubocop-i18n
  • Eglot
  • Helix
  • Flycheck
Independently observed

Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.