Puppeteer vs Selenium
No clear leader: Puppeteer (72.3) and Selenium (71.7) are within the 5-point margin; treat as a tie. The attribute-by-attribute breakdown below, with a source and date on every value, is the honest way to compare them.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for testing tools. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Puppeteer
Provides programmatic control of Chrome and Firefox browsers for automation and testing through a JavaScript API.
Selenium
Selenium is an open-source testing framework that automates web browsers for testing applications and automating web-based administration tasks across multiple programming languages.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
- Chrome
- Firefox
Puppeteer
- DevTools Protocol
- WebDriver BiDi
- chrome-devtools-mcp
Selenium
- Edge
- Appium
- Chrome for Testing (CfT)
Puppeteer or Selenium: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.