Productive vs Teamwork.com
On the evidence we track, Teamwork.com leads this comparison with a composite score of 68/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for professional services automation. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Productive
Productive helps agencies, consultancies, and services firms streamline operations through integrated time tracking, resource planning, project budgeting, invoicing, and profitability reporting in a unified platform.
Teamwork.com
LeaderA cloud-based platform for managing professional services delivery that emphasizes project profitability and cost tracking. It integrates with CRM and accounting systems to streamline work management and financial operations.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
- Google Calendar
- Slack
- Zapier
- Xero
- QuickBooks
Productive
- Exact
- Visma e-conomic
- Jira
Teamwork.com
Leader- HubSpot
- Salesforce
- NetSuite
- Dropbox
- ChatGPT
Productive or Teamwork.com: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.