Productive vs Teamwork.com
On the evidence we track, Teamwork.com leads this comparison with a composite score of 70/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for professional services automation. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Productive
Productive helps agencies, consultancies, and services firms streamline operations through integrated time tracking, resource planning, project budgeting, invoicing, and profitability reporting in a unified platform.
Teamwork.com
LeaderAll-in-one platform designed for client-facing teams to manage projects, allocate resources, track time, and monitor profitability. Integrates AI assistants for intelligent scheduling, project planning, and resource optimization.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
- Google Calendar
- Slack
- Zapier
- Xero
- QuickBooks
Productive
- Exact
- Visma e-conomic
- Jira
Teamwork.com
Leader- HubSpot
- Salesforce
- NetSuite
- Dropbox
- ChatGPT
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.