PostDICOM vs Radiant DICOM Viewer
On the evidence we track, PostDICOM leads this comparison with a composite score of 57/100. Scores are only directly comparable because these tools share a category; the full breakdown and every source is below.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for medical imaging pacs. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
PostDICOM
LeaderA cloud-based medical imaging platform that stores, manages, and shares diagnostic images (DICOM and non-DICOM formats) with secure access, advanced viewing tools, and integration capabilities. No local server infrastructure required.
Radiant DICOM Viewer
A Windows-based viewer for DICOM medical images that enables study comparison, multiplanar reconstruction, and secure file sharing through anonymization. Supports PACS system integration and exports to various image and video formats.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
PostDICOM
Leader- Professional-
- Premium-
- Patient Upload Links
- Enterprise-
- API & FHIR / HL7 Integrations
- Patient Upload Links
- CustomContact sales
- Custom API Integrations
- Dedicated account management
- Priority support
Radiant DICOM Viewer
Trial version available. Subscription and perpetual license options offered.
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
PostDICOM
Leader- FHIR
- HL7
- DICOMweb
- API
- EMR
- EHR
- HIS
- RIS
- CIS
Radiant DICOM Viewer
- PACS
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.