Port vs Qovery
No clear leader: Qovery (81.0) and Port (79.3) are within the 5-point margin; treat as a tie. The attribute-by-attribute breakdown below, with a source and date on every value, is the honest way to compare them.
Capabilities
Feature-by-feature on the axes that matter for internal developer platforms. “-” means undocumented, not absent.
What each one is
The product in its own terms, so the numbers below have context.
Port
An internal developer portal that helps teams catalog software, automate infrastructure and development tasks, and self-serve common operations through customizable workflows, integrations, and AI agents.
Qovery
A self-service infrastructure platform that allows development teams and AI agents to deploy applications across multiple cloud providers (AWS, GCP, Azure, Kubernetes, Scaleway) while maintaining security controls, audit trails, and policy enforcement without requiring cloud infrastructure expertise.
Pricing
List pricing as published by each vendor, with the date we read it. Always verify at the source before you buy.
Port
From $30/seat/month billed annually. Free tier for up to 15 seats.
- FreeFree
- Access to full platform
- Community support
- Up to 10k entities
- Up to 500 automation runs
- Basic$30/seat/month billed annually
- Commercial support (6 hour response)
- Up to 50k entities
- 99.8% uptime SLA
- Unlimited AI agent usage with own LLM
- Standard$40/seat/month billed annually
- Commercial support (6 hour response)
- Up to 250k entities
- Up to 2k automation runs
- Dynamic permissions
- Single sign-on
- +2 more
- EnterpriseContact sales
- Enterprise support (4 hour critical response)
- SCIM provisioning
- IP allowlisting and Private Link
- Flexible deployment options
- 99.9% uptime SLA
Qovery
Free tier up to 100 deployments. Paid plans from $49/month.
- FreeFree
Platform & deployment
Where each product runs and how it can be hosted. A dash means undocumented, not unsupported.
Integrations
What each product connects to. Counts come from the vendor's own integration directory where one exists.
- GitHub
- AWS
- Jira
- Cursor
- Terraform
- Datadog
- Prometheus
- Kubernetes
- Linear
- Bitbucket
- GitHub Copilot
Port
- GCP
- Slack
- n8n
- GitLab
- Grafana
- Okta
- OneLogin
- Azure
- Google Cloud
- Terraform Cloud
- ServiceNow
- LaunchDarkly
- New Relic
- Dynatrace
- Wiz
- ArmorCode
- Aikido
- Checkmarx
- Rootly
- incident.io
- Statuspage
- Jenkins
- Codefresh
- OpenShift
- +21 more
Qovery
- GitHub Actions
- GitLab CI
- AWS EKS
- Google Cloud GKE
- Azure AKS
- OpenTofu
- Pulumi
- AWS Secrets Manager
- HashiCorp Vault
- Doppler
- Splunk
- Dash0
- Cloudflare
- AWS Route 53
- Docker Hub
- Amazon ECR
- GitHub Container Registry
- PostgreSQL
- MySQL
- MongoDB
- Claude Code
- Codex
- Gemini
- E2B
- +9 more
Port or Qovery: which one depends on you
A composite score cannot know your constraints. Describe them and both get re-weighted against what you actually need, with the evidence behind every position.
Free to run, no account needed to start. How the evaluation works
Comparison generated from independently-sourced facts. Every value links to its source and retrieval date. See the method.